Misguided people often ask government for more regulations to protect Florida's coral reefs.  Government does not prevent destruction of coral reefs, it aids destruction. Abuse results from soggy socialism's "tragedy of the commons" - the neglect that results to any resource that is not protected by private property rights.  "Public" (state) ownership of large bodies of water has long defeated reef aquaculture and other undersea farming along with its abundant ecology.  Socialism has been as environmentally disastrous underwater as it has been on land.
    The only way to correct the mess is with property rights.  Private property rights would encourage reef owners to increase reef size and reproduction through aquaculture and scientifically assisted reproduction and growth.  Private property rights in water will create profit incentives for construction of better reefs for commercial scuba diving and to improve commercial fishing and paid recreational fishing.
    Contrary to environmentalist hysteria, it is easy to make frames to cultivate man-made reefs that grow faster and live better than natural reefs. Sophisticated structures for artificial reefs have been built at Eilat, Israel.  Even near Key Largo, reefs have been built the old-fashioned way - by sinking obsolete ships.
    Government ownership of saltwater floors does not allow commercial reef construction. Even if it was allowed, there would be no profit incentive for doing so, so long as government owned the area.
    Environmentalists ignore the idea of private property rights in reefs.  If the first agricultural farmers had consulted modern reef experts, they would have been advised that private property in land would not work. Self-proclaimed environmentalists purchase farmed fish and other farmed food and never see any hypocrisy between their daily economic decisions and their attitude toward reef areas.  Environmentalists swallow underwater socialism hook, line and sinker.
    Most editorials are hardly any better, as they parrot the typical marine commentary in television, radio or print.  It is a constant whine, "if only there were more regulations,"  "if only there were more law enforcement officers."  It is such a gestapo drone it is a comedy, made funnier by the complete blindness to the only meaningful alternative: private property rights and free market economics.
    The duty of government is to recognize and protect property rights in all things, wet or dry.  Littoral and riparian rights, ancient laws recognizing property rights in oceans and rivers, have never waded far from shore.  Water rights are old enough to dive deep, if the law does not drown them.  There is no reason why private property rights should end at the water's edge.

Rex Curry
rexy@ij.net
http://rexcurry.net/