News
media reports are supposed to be “objective.” The word “objective” means
that both sides of a story are told by the writer. Writers fail to be objective
on many topics, including “price gouging.” News reports only repeat politicians
who claim that “price gouging” is bad. Can you correct the news reports about
“price gouging” and present both sides of the story? Write a paragraph or
more that could be inserted into most news reports to present the other side
of the story. Use the links below -
I had planned on making a killing this week.
Lease an 18-wheeler. Load up on gallons of gasoline, a gross of generators
and enough bottled water to satisfy a dipsomaniac crawling in the
But before I could clean out Sam's Club,
Charlie Crist, the
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/columnists/vassilaros/s_249644.html
Laws that ban price gouging are laws that
kill people.
The need to hoard rises when government bans price gouging.
Price Gouging Saves lives http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=1593
The only thing worse than Katrina's devastating destruction
is government's horrific "help." http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers16.html
So-called "price gouging" in emergencies is also defended
by Walter Williams HERE: http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3578
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/walterwilliams/ww20040324.shtml
Frank Bubb HERE: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/text/fbubb_hurricane-gouging.asp?mc
and by Sheldon Richman HERE: http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=6181
Economics textbook chapters on price controls are excerpted
here: http://FreedomKeys.com/pricecontrols.htm