HANDICAPPED NAZIS & FASCISTS: THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADA CHALLENGED, DISABLED & HANDICAPPED
As an attorney, Dr. Rex Curry is consulted by people fighting handicapped-parking
laws and other violations of private property rights. The disabled
lobbied for laws that force others to provide special parking spaces. They
lobbied for police powers, to patrol private property like the Gestapo,
issuing written citations to parking offenders, even the property owner.
Some disabled people are so obnoxious about parking spaces that they are
like storm troopers.
http://rexcurry.net/commentary/handicap.html
In her article "The Fascist New Frontier," the capitalist philosopher Ayn
Rand condemned fascism, saying, "under fascism, men retain the semblance
or pretense of private property, but the government holds power over its
use and disposal." The authoritarian frontier now includes the handicapped.
Disabled Nazis control private property wherever the notorious wheelchair
symbols are posted, the stick-figure swastikas of the disabled elite. Their
authoritarian attitude inspired a scornful sticker at and the scornful term
"handicrap laws." http://rexcurry.net/artlibertarian/gst_nazi.jpg
Disabled authoritarians owe a debt of gratitude (which they will never pay)
to the free market. Free enterprise creates affordable automobiles, machine
control devices and lift technology. Capitalism creates affordable aluminum,
nylon, rubber and lightweight technology used in modern wheelchairs.
Handicapped statists do not pay or persuade people to build spaces. They
say “thanks” by demanding ramps and special parking spaces. Free enterprise
liberates people who respond with control and regulation.
Rows of empty handicapped spaces can always be found in crowded parking garages
and lots. Spaces and ramps can be found at businesses that were forced
to build them at great cost, only to watch the expended resources lay idle.
The physically handicapped cripple the financially handicapped.
Anyone who complains is tagged "uncharitable" or "rude." Bowing to
compulsory regulations is not charity. Interfering with another person's
property is rude. There is nothing wrong with the voluntary provision of
handicap facilities, but it is wrong when it is required. Such laws do not
liberate the disabled. The laws proclaims that the disabled are dependent
upon government to achieve their goals.
Not all handicapped persons support handicap regulations or their enforcement.
Some handicapped persons are libertarians or objectivists or otherwise support
private property rights and non-interference in the lives of others.
They are handicapitalists. The only purpose of law should be to protect people
and their property from interference by others. When people make laws
that stray from this purpose, they are violators of rights.