Calladus blog is a kooky stalker on the internet. From the start, all
Calladus can do is stalk for personal insults he spews, because he can't
have a dialog about facts. His kooky writing habit makes him easy to mock
(see below). His idiotic comments are only amusing when they are repeated
back to him. His jealousy and envy (and ignorance) embarrass him wherever
he goes. That makes him even weirder than he originally seemed.
Calladus admits to failing at research and gives the lame excuse that
the servers he tried "were down." He later admitted that the information
he doubted was in fact correct.
Calladus has been laughed at by the internet community for his ignorance
and evasions concerning the topics discussed here.
Calludus spends a lot of time cruising the web and posting anonymously
in order to hide from his own kooky comments. So even though he's not a professor
(isn't Calladus not having tenure grand?), Calladus is still quite a kook
who makes Lyndon LaRouche look sane. Does Calladus register with and support
people in the same party as LaRouche: the Democratic Party? Is Calladus
a LaRouche Democrat? (LaRouche always called himself a Democrat and always
ran as a Democrat. Another example of Calladus' stupidity that ends up smacking
Calladus back in his own face).
Calladus is the one who wants children to chant robotically to flags,
even to the point that Calladus wants to enlarge the ritual that was the
origin of America's early "nazi" salute, and the origin of the actual "nazi"
salute used by German National Socialists. Is there a short word that describes
people such as that? Just how similar is Calladus to other people who are/were
into robotic group-chanting with prescribed gestures to government flags?
Altough he lives under and enjoys great freedom, Calladus is a hypocrite
who denounces freedom and whines for more government and for the worship
of government. Calladus blog idolizes a Christian Socialist who was a religious
wacko, and Calladus wants everyone else to idolize the religious wacko and
his work.
Maybe Calladus will stop obsessing over how to evade the topic (which
he started by evading in the first place) and get on with his own life
(and stop promoting interference in the lives of others, especially children).
He keeps promising to do so. http://rexcurry.net/calladus_blog_mark_fresno_atheist.html
Calladus has yet to explain the "insidious connection" (Calladus'
phrase) that he babbles about between Hindu and Native Americans with
the Nazis. Calladus has kooky conspiracy theories and said this: "obviously
they all use the same symbol, a Swastika, so they are all Socialists bent
on world dominion." Calladus disparages the Hindu and Native American symbol
by claiming that they used the same symbol as the Nazis (even though Calladus
knows that what he is saying is wrong). That is why Calladus evades
actual discussion of the topic as he knows it would highlight his errors.
For example, Calladus evades the fact that the Nazis did not call their
symbol a "swastika." Calladus can't bear that fact since he was schooled
about it by RexCurry.net, so Calladus just keeps pretending otherwise, as
he claims it was the same symbol. German National Socialists called their
symbol a "hakenkreuz" because it was a type of cross (a hooked cross). In
the same way, Calladus evades the fact that the Nazis did not call themselves
"Nazis." Calladus can't bear to use the name that they actually called themselves.
No one should wonder why considering that Calladus wants to maintain and
enlarge daily robotic chanting by children to government flags in government
schools (socialist schools).
The Nazis altered their flag's symbol further by turning it 45 degress
from the horizontal and orienting it always in the S-direction as alphabetical
symbolism for "socialism" under the "National Socialist German Workers
Party." Calladus cannot face reality, so Calladus persists in disparaging
the Hindu and Native American symbol by claiming that they used the same
symbol as the Nazis (or is Calladus making another one of his kooky conspiracy
claims by claiming that the Hindu and Native American symbol was intended
by Hindus and Native Americans to represent S-letters for "socialism"?).
On the other hand, Dr. Curry has written volumes on the topic (debunking
kooky claims from people of Calladus' ilk and pointing out the facts),
which Calladus cannot address. Some of the information that Calladus evades
is repeated here to make his evasions difficult and embarrassing.
Before the Calladus Blog was schooled, it repeated naive propaganda
about the pledge, as taught in government schools (socialist schools).
The Calladus blog was stereotypical for stupid atheists who know nothing
about the pledge and who want to laud and enlarge it. The only criticism
from Calladus was the two-word deification.
Of course, Calladus blog was also ignorant of the fact that the
two-word deification "under God" DID appear in Francis Bellamy's original
pledge program as well as other references to religion and prayer. That
"under God" was not in the pledge itself seems more an oversight by Bellamy,
who was a Christian socialist. That is another discovery that was made
and announced by Dr. Curry. http://rexcurry.net/pledgegod.html
When Francis Bellamy wrote references to religion and wrote "liberty
and justice for all" in his pledge program, he meant the liberty to have
government schools teach prayer and Bible reading and worship (which they
did), and the justice of Christian Socialism that Bellamy touted in his
dogma. Francis was a leader in the Society of Christian Socialists and
he advocated the government takeover of all schools to promote his dogma.
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
Calladus blog was unaware also of Dr. Curry's discovery that the
Pledge was the origin of the stiff-armed salute adopted later by the
National Socialist German Workers Party. http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
A public apology has been posted from the Calludus kook to the
historian Dr. Rex Curry.
Perhaps it is a sign that he is so certain of his wrongness that
he posts anonymously and the most he wants to reveal is that his name
is "Mark" and he is
* Male; * Industry: Engineering; * Occupation: Electronic Engineer;
* Location: Fresno : California : United States.
His credentials are suspect. The sparse information does not indicate
that he is a Ph.D nor a J.D. It does not indicate that he is a college instructor,
much less a kindergarten teacher (and if he is not a teacher, then
thank goodness for that). There is no indication that he has ever been
paid to write anything ever in his life.
That nut-case claims that he likes to "write on the support
of personal freedoms" but the best he can do on the Pledge is to ENLARGE
it with the suggestion that children include "equality for all."
How odd that Mark fancies himself as a skeptic, when nothing could be farther
from the truth. As the socialists say "Freedom is Slavery." It shows his
completely back-asswards concept of "personal freedoms." He is
so brain-washed by the Pledge and by government schools (socialist schools)
that he could not understand personal freedom even if it told him to
take his new pledge and shove it. What a kook!
His perverted concept of freedom is consistent with his comments
about Dr. Rex Curry's discoveries: He concedes all of Dr. Curry's work,
disputes nothing, and upon learning the truth about the Pledge, he merely
spewed insults because of his political bias. It shows his kookiness
and pseudoscience attitude. People like that really get angry when they
are told the truth and they learn that they have been repeating propaganda
all their lives and just became disabused.
Here is a quote from the Calladus Blog: "Perhaps Dr. Curry's
information is valid. I don't know yet, I just started researching it." http://rexcurry.net/pledgespeech.html
From Lysander at Class Context: Not until reading Rex Curry's criticism did
I realize that the pledge of allegiance is not an innocuous
ritual, but a disturbing remnant of American militant socialism.
The pledge was created by one of the Bellamy cousins and expressed their
favor for totalitarianism. It was ordained as an oath
of solidarity at the expense of individuality, compelling students to
believe their "value" exists only to the degree they submit
to the state.
The original hand gesture is even more frightening. As
it turns out, the placement of the hand over the heart is a modern
phenomenon. Curry writes:
The original pledge used a straight-arm salute
beginning in 1892. As the nation's leading authority on the pledge of
allegiance, RexCurry.net made the historic discovery that the salute of
the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis) originated from the
military salute in the USA, and from the original flag pledge (as written
by a socialist), and not from ancient Rome...
Because of the Bellamys, children used the "sieg
heil" gesture for flags flying over racist government schools through
the rise of Nazism (the hand-over-the-heart spread in 1942). The
bizarre practices served as an example for three decades before they were
adopted by the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The U.S.
practice of segregation even outlasted the horrid party, into the 1960's
and beyond. That is why the Bellamys are known as the "American Hitlers."
Take a look at some of the pictures on
Rex Curry's website for proof of the militaristic undperpinning. Needless
to say, I won't feel very comfortable asking students each morning
to stand and submit any longer. Does drilling this practice
into vulnerable adolescents every day not disturb others?
It has far too much of a "Big Brother" quality for my taste.
