DANIEL RUTH DOGMA EXPOSED ! http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg
Elaine Silvestrini, Tampa Tribune concedes that Dr. Rex Curry's work is correct ! http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Daniel Ruth http://rexcurry.net/silvestrini-elaine-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Elaine Silvestrini
Daniel Ruth LaRouche publicly humiliated (again!). Ruth canned & Tribune collapsing http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html

Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins. Elaine Silvestrini


Daniel Ruth promotes fetishism. He and his employers promote flag fetishism by covering up the history of the Pledge of Allegiance.  http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html

Recently, Ruth was schooled by RexCurry.net about the Pledge.

In an article about the web site Ruth did not dispute the work of the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry (author of "Pledge of Allegiance Secrets"). http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg

In the past Ruth was exposed when Dr. Curry handed Ruth a humiliating defeat in a public debate dare. Ruth publicly apologized to Dr. Curry for Ruth's errors.  The response against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free market statist, $#%!&, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist." http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html

Thereafter, Ruth's employer said to the kook: "Uh, Daniel Ruth? Start packing your bags!" Ruth was fired.

Ruth's use of "socialist" is revealing in that Ruth covers-up for the National Socialist German Workers Party and its deadly dogma. Ruth has probably never written the actual name of the group "National Socialist German Workers Party" ever in the Tribune (check it yourself).

On the newspaper's flag fetishism, Silvestrini and Ruth are disturbingly silent about Francis Bellamy, Edward Bellamy and their racism, bigotry, militarism, robotic chanting for children, and authoritarian socialism (and their influence upon German National Socialism, its symbols and rituals). Their silence becomes deafening about the related hate-mongering, persecution, violence, and even lynchings inspired by the Bellamys and their socialist religion. 

It becomes scarier in that Ruth refers to himself as the "Book of Ruth."

Good Grief, Lyndon LaRouche was not as delusional as Ruth is. Ruth writes flippantly about torture. LaRouche La Ruth's insane clown posse act is like something out of "Apocalypse Now" meets "A Clockwork Orange."




For many years, the near-sighted loony leprechaun (Ruth) has flittered about the fringes of political life in the Tampa Bay area as a sort of scary class clown, in the "special" section, hoping that his kindergarten cracks will make his teachers give up and leave him alone.

Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would let the critic find out if Ruth has a hybrid toupee/combover if the critic paid Ruth $5000 (Ruth knew that if Ruth put the price high enough the critic would pass on Ruth's toupee/combover question). Ruth, a Dominick Dunne wannabe, is the Rump-hole of the Insanely. One suspects that Ruth's flatulence worsens whenever Ruth rubs his brain cells together. Both of them.

Is Daniel "LaRouche La Ruth" the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? Has anyone ever seen those two together? Has the mystery of Ruth's hybrid toupee / combover question been solved? See the startling photographic evidence image at http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg

Ruth remains jealously mad about Dr. Curry's success in exposing Ruth and that explain's Ruth's pirouettes of linguistic blather. http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html

Previously, LaRouche La Ruth proved his supreme economic ignorance. Recently, he has proven his historical ignorance and his legal ignorance.

It is no wonder that Ruth's columns never state any qualifications he has to write articles about the topic (or any articles). Only Ruth's phone number and email address were given with no biographical or background information (nor any link to such information).  There is a complete lack of disclosure of whether Ruth has any licensing or educational achievement that qualifies him to write on such a topic, how he was selected, nor how much Ruth was paid to write the piece (It might embarrass him if they printed what he was paid). Ruth learned to write in  government schools on Planet Zircon 9. Compared to Dr. Curry's illustrious career, Ruth's name is longer than Ruth's career highlights.

As a career move, Daniel Ruth should not become a lawyer.  His "journalism" might cause some people to wonder if he is competent even to write about legal issues, or to write at all about anything. If Ruth is considering a job change then here is a Memo to Daniel Ruth: Don't start packing your bags. Ruth is in a turd trap as the Tampa Tribune twists down the toilet. See any internet search for "Tampa Tribune lays off."

Ruth's employer, the Tampa Tribune, is a so-called newspaper that has never published a historical photograph of the Pledge's early stiff-arm salute, nor printed an article about the Pledge's relationship to the salute of the National Socialist German Workers Party, its symbol and its rituals. Ruth has also never informed his readers about the new discoveries concerning the Pledge's past. http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg

If there has ever been an article about Francis Bellamy (author of the Pledge of Allegiance) in Ruth's newspaper it repeated the usual shallow propaganda common to most "news" outlets. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html

In that way, the Tampa Tribune perpetuates flag fetishism by repeating disinformation through touch-holes such as Ruth. They keep their readers ignorant.

Ruth's writing is similar to robotic chanting in worship of the state. His writing is robotic repetition of claptrap that is taught by the government and learned in government schools (socialist schools). http://rexcurry.net/saying-the-pledge-of-allegiance-pictures.html

That is why the self-important and smug Ruth does not make important discoveries; Ruth writes (badly) about the people who do make important discoveries.

Ruth will not state the simple issue: The Pledge of Allegiance (and its author) was the origin of the salute of the National Socialist German Workers Party and influenced its symbols and rituals. Ruth is a denier and a historical revisionist. Is Ruth dense or does lack of integrity and honesty make him unwilling to provide simple accurate reporting?

The Tampa Tribune Newspaper is dead and this space is happy to have achieved its top goal in killing the Tampa Tribune Newspaper. This blog also thanks the Pointer Institute for Media Studies for helping this blog, along with with the Dead Writers Club (DWC – an author’s group).

The Pointer Institute provides remedial education to journalists about history, economics, government, and more.  They un-tangle those twelve years of brainwashing that cripples news reporters.  The DWC also fights media incompetency and dishonesty and toward that goal it joined with the Pointer Institute and with this blog in 2016 to shut down the Tampa Tribune Newspaper.

We apologize to all the people who did not make the party celebrating the Tribune’s demise.  It was a festival of local luminaries.

The goal of both Tampa Bay area newspapers has always been to expand the existing socialist police state.  They do so by keeping their readers ignorant.  That is another reason why so many local groups and people worked together to put the Tribune out of business.  The Tampa Bay Times is not doing well either.

The Tampa Bay Times Newspaper (TBT) covers up the National Socialist German Workers Party and the origin of its dogma, symbols, and rituals. Perhaps that is because the TBT building is adorned with swastikas and a huge U.S. flag put on a pole out front every day.

Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize covering up for socialists at the New York Times (NYT).  TBT follows Duranty’s prize-winning strategy.  TBT is upset about recent talk of a Pulitzer Prize (that will NOT go to TBT) for exposing socialism and the Pledge of Allegiance as the origin of Nazi salutes and Nazi behavior.

Daniel “LaRouche” Ruth helped kill the Tribune during his time working for the fish wrapper. After LaRouche was fired by the Tampa Tribune, TBT hired him.  TBT did so despite his history of Nazi-style name-calling.  After LaRouche’s loss in a public debate challenge the local response against the crackpot was so great that LaRouche said he was labeled a “Dork, anti-free market statist, $#%!&, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist.”  Ruth’s nickname could be “Duranty” (instead of “LaRouche”).

Not long after the “socialist” crack, Ruth’s employer/newspaper said to the kook: “Uh, Daniel Ruth? Start packing your bags!”

On another occasion, Ruth admitted publicly that locals have labeled him “bigot, prejudiced, hateful and ignorant.”

La Ruth jokes about torture. Good Grief, LaRouche was not that delusional!

Ruth supports bleating the socialist Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and said so with his nazi-style name-calling.  It is revealing to note that the TBT hoists the flag daily in front of its swastika-decked crib; flag hag LaRouche is not out front daily to bleat his sacred flaggotry.  Bleating only takes 12 seconds a day for life, so why not, LaRuth?  LaRuth prefers the earlier gesture (he was schooled about it from Dr. Rex Curry’s historical discoveries).

TBT reinforced its masthead, “America’s Dumbest Newspaper,” when it was duped by America’s Dumbest Criminals.  Thereafter, America’s Dumbest Newspaper duped its readers (both of them).  America’s Dumbest Readers.

Daniel Ruth Tampa Bay Times

Daniel Ruth links:

Daniel Ruth Exposed Youtube channel




Daniel Ruth Tampa Tribune Flag Fetishism Nazis LaRouche

Daniel Ruth – is he the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? See the photographic evidence at  http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2898419047/



Ruth failed to discuss nor even enumerate the six or more issues in Dr. Curry's legal brief argued on behalf of the defendant in a recent federal appellate hearing. Ruth has the ability to let his audience decide for themselves because Ruth could post Dr. Curry's brief on the web site of the Tampa Tribune or TBO.com, but Ruth did not do so and will not do so because the brief would expose his inane comments, omissions and cover-ups. Readers are misled and kept ignorant.

If you read newspapers for years then you will see all manner of ditzoid craziness that slops its way over the journalistic gunwales -claims of UFO abductions, the conspiracy theorists, Nazi cabals, deranged threatening environmentalists and people who believe monkeys are taking over the world.

And those are just some of the serious news stories. There are some newspaper writers, too, who are really weird. Take Daniel Ruth. Please, take him.

For all the black helicopter sightings and arguments Shecky Green and the Jewish lobby control the government and Y2K means the end of the world, Daniel Ruth has to be not only the most certifiably insane, but perhaps the most twistedly evasive.

The Felliniesque Fidel Castro never answered any of the original questions. For example, why is the federal government growing so large, taking over criminal law nationwide, and becoming involved in what in the past would have been state level cases? Daniel Ruth - a "newspaper" writer  - weighed in with one long sputtering bluster against historical reality. Loopy Ruth did his usual mental blank-out. The Karl Marx of the Twilight Zone responded with a bunch of journalistic babble and name-calling that is his "trademark."

Ruth is one of the most visible local disciples of the Tampa Tribune, which ought to have his embarrassed fellow travelers donning Groucho Marx disguises around the office and about town.

You have to wonder what schools Ruth went to.  Government schools?  The government taught him everything it knows and he is still stupid.  But that is statist quo.

Ruth a writer with a big public forum and his reasoning is that of half-baked socialism/statism.  Terrifying.

Ruth's remarks are a reminder of the cliche' "If you can't do, and you can't teach, then write."

Ruth knows that the media debate challenge that was issued by Dr. Rex Curry as quoted by another Tribune reporter ( Elaine Silvestrini ), is also available to Ruth and Ruth knows that everyone else knows that Ruth has always been too cowardly to do it over the many years and he never will. The only person Ruth is fooling is himself.

It will always remain another media debate challenge victory for Dr. Curry over Daniel Ruth and the Tampa Tribune.

Ruth's comments raise the question of whether Ruth is unable to recognize any meritorious arguments in the six or more issues raised on behalf of the defendant in the brief. One of those issues was "insufficiency of the evidence" which is probably the most common issue argued in appeals of criminal cases.

Ruth's comments are especially odd considering that similar appellate issues were raised and argued in six issues raised by another attorney in a related case involving Scott Schweickert, charged as a co-conspirator.  

Was Ruth saying that he would provide ineffective assistance of counsel to a defendant by waiving / abandoning all the issues? Was Ruth saying that Ruth would file an Anders brief for both defendants (in an Anders brief a defense attorney openly states that he believes there are no meritorious issues to argue for a defendant)?

Ineffective assistance of counsel is shown primarily by waiving and abandoning issues. Not by having an extra issue that is not victorious. Most appeals are unsuccessful, meaning that all arguments made in most cases are rejected by the appellate court.

Here is other information that was known to Daniel Ruth and that he omitted from his article: The issues raised in Dr. Curry's brief are not uncommon and similar to most of the issues raised in other briefs, such as that of the Defendant Scott Schweikert (for example, insufficiency of the evidence). Some of the issues were also raised in articles in Ruth's newspaper (the Tampa Tribune) about the case and are also supported by comments made by some judges, jurors and other observers concerning the charges, the trial and the sentence (and some of that is in the brief). The issues are also supported by other people such as the former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi (author of the book "The Prosecution of President George W. Bush for Murder"). It is also consistent with what has been the law historically in the U.S.A.

Some of the issues have also met with some success in United States v. Stewart 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003) an opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski (who
will be speaking in Tampa to the Federal Bar Association during the same month as this communication to Silvestrini). The Stewart case is available at various locations on the web including http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/348/348.F3d.1132.02-10318.html

Similar arguments were made unsuccessfully in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) (the medical marijuana case cited in the government's brief and in Dr. Curry's brief). United States v. Stewart is a case involving a challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922o under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that mere possession of homemade machine guns can not be constitutionally regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause. Upon granting certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the Ninth Circuit's ruling and remanded the case back to the court for further consideration in light of its ruling in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) where a new decision was issued in Stewart. see http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/315E1DE83BC0D4258825719D005C71F8/$file/0210318.pdf?openelement

Ruth's inability to undertand the jurisdictional argument on appeal (that the federal government lacked jurisdiction in the case) is bizarre in light of the May 1, 2007 article in the Tampa Tribune reporting that Judge Merryday "...said the federal government is 'not situated to prosecute the real offense, which prosecution is situated in the state of Florida.' "

The Tampa Tribune also wrote, regarding Curry's client: "In sentencing [the defendant] last year, U.S. District Judge Richard Lazzara said that if he were a circuit judge [state level] and the prosecution had brought capital murder charges, the government would have no trouble establishing the presence of four aggravating factors - facets of the case legally required for a death sentence."

Ruth is guilty of ineffective assistance of reporting.

It is no wonder why old-style "newspapers" such as Ruth's are dying out as people turn to the internet for more accurate information.

Every landmark decision by a federal appellate court or the Supreme Court (e.g. Miranda, or the recent case finding the sentencing guidelines unconstititional) is a "landmark" case because it was unanticipated by most people, including such as Ruth and his ilk. 

Ruth is ignorant about the topic of articles that he writes. Although he refused to include it in column, Ruth was aware of Dr. Curry's famous drug-dog case resulting in the suppression of evidence. The government unsuccessfully tried to appeal all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the government's petition on Oct. 31, 2005 in case # 04-1668. Search for "Matheson" on this web page http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/orders/2005/103105pzor.html
The government also unsuccessfully appealed to Florida's Supreme Court to overturn the victory. Also see the Second District Court of Appeal opinoin at

Ruth deliberately leaves pertinent information out of his columns to make his columns misleading. Although he refused to include it in his article, Ruth was aware of another case in which a prosecutor wanted Dr. Curry to abandon an issue and withdraw a  motion to suppress evidence. Instead, Curry's motion was granted and the government dismissed the charges against Curry's client as well as two other defendants.

Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins

Here is another victory by Dr. Curry in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. http://rexcurry.net/lawcunningham.html
And another victory by Dr. Curry in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. http://rexcurry.net/romanoappeal.html
And another victory in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals http://rexcurry.net/law-martinez-11th-victory.pdf

And other courts.
A win in Federal court http://rexcurry.net/lawmaldon.html
LAWYERS, GUNS (& MONEY) - gun returned after illegal carry charge is defeated. http://rexcurry.net/gunbeeson.html
DRUGS, GUNS & BAD POLICE SEARCHES - another victory for liberty & peacful conduct. http://rexcurry.net/lawWhite.html
ORJALES v. FLORIDA - a 3 year minimum mandatory gun sentence is overturned. http://rexcurry.net/laworjales.html
BALDWIN v. FLORIDA - another 3 year minimum mandatory gun sentence is stricken. http://rexcurry.net/lawbaldwin.html
PEACEFUL COCAINE SALE WITH BAD PURSE SEARCH - lady is free to go. http://rexcurry.net/law%20graphics/tara.html
COPS: THEIR OWN ANONYMOUS TIP SOURCES? - not in this cocaine case. http://rexcurry.net/lawJohnson.html
SELF-REPRESENTATION IN COURT - a lawyer preserves the right to be lawyerless. http://rexcurry.net/lawNeeld.htm

People of Ruth's ilk were completely discouraging about Curry's drug-dog case at the trial level and then wondered why Curry bothered to initiate the appeal.  Later, the same people all expressed amazement at Curry's victory and cited his case.

All "landmark" cases are cases that seemed pointless until the unexpected happened.

How would the Supreme Court ever reverse itself (and it has done so) if no one ever bothered to try and keep raising issues upon which the Supreme Court has already ruled?

Daniel Ruth displayed his igorance about President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's court-packing scam. That scam was as unexpected as was the Supreme Court's "switch in time that saved nine" (also known as the "switch in time that socialized nine") that drastically changed the course of the federal courts.

Ruth doesn't try. Ruth is ineffective and unable to do anything but give up and bend over for the government/prosecution.  Ruth would provide ineffective assistance by deliberately NOT raising issues on appeal because he doesn't want to "distract" from other arguments.  That is a complete waiver / abandonment of the issues. 

There are many REAL examples of ineffective assistance from people who DID abandon issues, using Ruth's reasoning.

The opposite can also occur with a good lawyer: Give the judges a unique issue so that they think that the brief is interesting and they want to have oral arguments, unlike the thousand boring briefs that all sound the same that are filed by the people of Ruth's ilk, and that aren't set for oral arguments.

Dr. Curry's appellate brief was set for oral argument by the appellate court.


Ruth's uninformative writing is especially odd in light of an earlier Tampa Tribune article concerning Chief Judge Alex Kozinski being accused of posting sexually explicit material onwebsite. On the same topic see
and http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/jun/13/na-judge-calls-for-probe-of-his-porn-posting/


Ruth is so out-of-touch with reality (and so defective as a "writer") that he does not realize there ARE lawyers who carry guns into courthouses, as well as many other people who do. (P.S. please don't help him wise up, as he will want to disarm all of them).

Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins
Daniel Ruth and Lyndon LaRouche. Is Daniel "LaRouche La Ruth" the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? Has anyone ever seen those two together? Has the mystery of Ruth's hybrid toupee / combover question been solved? See the startling photographic evidence image at http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg

Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Pledge of Allegiance & Daniel Ruth
Daniel Ruth Tampa Tribune was educated by RexCurry.net
        about the Pledge of Allegiance ditto for Elaine Silvestrini
Daniel Ruth re: Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Pledge of Allegiance

The following was written by the attorney known as Double D. --

Danny Ruth’s hyperbolic attack on Dr. Rex Curry is entertaining, but even more surrealistic and bizarre than the lawyer’s jurisdictional challenge on appeal from the conviction of a man found beyond a reasonable doubt of drugging, raping and torturing nine men and killing two. Ruth’s suggestion that, but for appellate counsel, the defendant might have looked forward to packing his bags and getting out of prison is as delusional as the defendant’s defense, as reported by the Tampa Tribune during the trial, that the drugging and raping and torturing and murdering was merely consensual deviant sex. The defendant’s retained defense counsel could not “in good faith … make an honest argument” for judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case because the prima facie evidence was overwhelming as to all but one of the counts. A sufficiency of evidence challenge having thus been waived, it is hard to imagine what appellate argument Ruth thinks could have won the defendant a get-out-of-jail-free card. Nor does Ruth report any “silver bullet” that ought to have won a remand for new trial or sentencing.

The court appointed Dr. Curry about a year after sentencing the defendant, finding the defendant indigent, permitting retained counsel to withdraw and reinstating the appeal that had been dismissed. So, after delving into the cold record on appeal, what Curry, and others, might have found unfathomable is that the defendant was prosecuted in federal court for a drug conspiracy and distribution of the “date rape drug” GHB, rather than in state court on rape and felony murder charges. Indeed, the point of Curry’s jurisdictional argument was that it seems silly, if not plain unfair to everyone involved, to bring a case on federal drug charges largely in the absence of any lab results showing the presence of drugs in the victims, when all the victims and witnesses can talk about is rape, torture and murder, for which crimes there is no federal jurisdiction under the interstate commerce clause. What Ruth either doesn’t know, or doesn’t care to share, is that a jurisdictional challenge may be raised at any time during the proceedings and potentially could result in a conviction being tossed. Curry went for it, probably because that’s all there was.

Admittedly, as Danny Ruth so sympathetically, albeit uncharacteristically, points out, “when you’ve been sentenced to 200 years in federal prison on numerous drug
charges you’re probably not having a very good day.” However, 200 years is better than facing the needle, or Old Sparky, for murder. The sad fact that Ruth ignores, as he bemoans the sentence on the defendant’s behalf, is that the court could not have imposed anything more. Twenty years is the maximum sentence permitted by federal law for charged crimes of drugging a person with GHB with the intent to commit a violent crime, including rape and murder. Although it was suggested at sentencing that the advisory guidelines could be interpreted to allow application of murder guidelines and imposition of a life sentence, the judge took the cautious approach and exercised his discretion to impose maximum concurrent sentences as a reasonable punishment for the crimes. As was his obligation, Curry challenged the reasonableness of the sentence and the lack of prior notice that the judge intended to depart. But it probably occurred to Curry as he wrote the brief that a maximum sentence of twenty years for doping someone with GHB for the purpose of raping and killing them seems a bit paltry as a punishment in light of the mandatory minimum life sentences federal courts routinely impose on repeat, street level crack dealers. The Bush Administration’s touching defense of the use of torture in the interrogation of prisoners of war and alleged terrorists, however, probably doesn’t have anything to do with the disparity in sentences, unless one believes Congress is comprised of sick perverts, too.

Oddly, Ruth also implies by juxtaposition that the defendant’s sentence is unjustly harsh as compared to Schweickert’s 40-year sentence and that, but for Curry, the appellate court might have found it so. But Ruth fails to report that Schweickert, too, got the maximum sentence the court could impose, notwithstanding that he apparently confessed to the killings.

In the end, Ruth’s ridicule of Dr. Curry’s efforts seems to suggest that more process is due the sadistic murdering pervert. If that’s the case, just say “No!” if Ruth ever offers to buy you a cocktail.

The above was written by the attorney known as Double D.

Elaine Silvestrini, Tampa Tribune concedes that Dr. Rex Curry's work is correct ! http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Daniel Ruth http://rexcurry.net/silvestrini-elaine-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Elaine Silvestrini
Daniel Ruth LaRouche publicly humiliated (again!). Ruth canned & Tribune collapsing http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html

Daniel Ruth: RexCurry.net's work exposing the Pledge of Allegiance educated the Tampa Tribune Newspaper columnist Daniel Ruth.
THE SICK SOCIALIST SWASTIKA http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg SWASTIKAS & DANIEL RUTH
Daniel Ruth Tampa Tribune was educated by RexCurry.net
        about the sick socialist swastika, ditto for Elaine Silvestrini
DANIEL RUTH & THE SICK SOCIALIST SWASTIKA http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg SWASTIKAS

Benito Mussolini & Elaine Silvestrini http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini
Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussollini
Benito Mussolini & Elaine Silvestrini http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini
Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini. The Italian cohort of German National Socialism (Benito Mussolini) developed power as a socialist "journalist" among socialists and socialist newspapers in Italy. He covered up the origin of National Socialist dogma and of its stiff-armed salute. Many modern media mussolinis become mean or tyrannical when an interviewee wants to make a record of an interview. Learn more at RexCurry.net

Pledge of Allegiance youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4 youtube Pledge of Allegiance

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-rexcurrydotnet.wmv FRANCIS BELLAMY