Has the mystery of Ruth's hybrid toupee / combover question been solved?
(Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would
let the critic find out if Ruth has a hybrid
toupee/combover if the critic paid Ruth $5000 -Ruth
knew that if the price was high then the critic would
pass on Ruth's toupee/combover question).
See
the startling photographic evidence at http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg
The Tribune is also a torture conspiracy for the victims/survivors of
crimes. If victims re-live crime trauma in multiple trials then they can
blame Ruth and Silvestrini and people who think as they do. Sadistic Silvestrini
and Ruth stupidly hail the ballooning federal
government and for victims of gruesome crimes
to endure multiple trials that are costly and time-consuming.
They are morbid
news nazis in a clockwork orange. If it were up to Ruth, Silvestrini
and their BDSM ilk then the federal and state government
would take turns re-trying the same "newsy" cases annually
so that Ruth and Silvestrini would have something about
which to babble. Ruth and Silvestrini are 2 girls and 1 cup journalism.
It is no wonder that columns by Silvestrini and Ruth never state any qualifications
they have to write
articles about legal topics (or any topics).
Only their phone numbers and email addresses
were given with no biographical or background information
(nor any link to such information). Compared to
Dr. Curry's illustrious career, Silvestrini's name
is longer than her career highlights. There is a complete
lack of disclosure of whether Silvestrini or Ruth have
any licensing or educational achievement that
qualifies either to write on such a topic, how they were
selected, nor how much they were paid to write (It might
embarrass them if the Tampa Tribune printed what they were paid.
They are no where near being paid $100 per hour). They learned to
write in government schools on Planet Zircon 9. Silvestrini is
the Touch-hole of the Insanely. Many readers do not know that Ruth
is a wiener of the pull-it surprise. Silvestrini helped him. (That is
a coveted achievement among "jurinalists"). http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg
Dr. Curry's illustrious career has
recently acquired two additional achievements: aiding in the firing
of Daniel Ruth, and exposing and defeating Ruth and Silvestrini in
public.
As a career move, Silvestrini and Ruth should not become lawyers. Their
"journalism" might cause some people
to wonder if they are competent
even to write about legal issues, or to write
at all about anything. If they are considering
a job change then here is a Memo to Silvestrini and Ruth:
Don't start packing your bags.
Silvestrini also wrote, regarding Curry's client: "In sentencing [the defendant]
last year, U.S. District Judge
Richard Lazzara said that if he were a circuit
judge [state level] and the prosecution had brought
capital murder charges, the government would have
no trouble establishing the presence of four aggravating
factors - facets of the case legally required for
a death sentence "
Silvestrini shows her denseness by repeatedly phoning (more than five years
and counting?) the state prosecutor's
office to ask when the state will begin
a trial in the matter. Each time, Silvestrini
writes that state action will be announced
"soon." Perhaps Silvestrini thinks the state needs
to hurry before the defendant's 200 years in federal
prison is up. Perhaps Silvestrini secretly believes
that Dr. Curry's legal arguments will prevail and that
the defendant will be released soon. Her blockheaded phone
calls have probably provided the state-level prosecutor's
office with comic relief.
Silvestrini misquoted Dr. Curry in Silvestrini's article when she wrote
that
Dr. Curry "said in an e-mail exchange that
he plans in his argument to the court
to quote from the book 'The Prosecution of President
George W. Bush for Murder' by the former prosecutor
Vincent Bugliosi." The email shows that Silvestrini's
comment is incorrect and that Dr. Curry was wise
to restrict Silvestrini to written communication.
Even when a Tampa Tribune reporter like Silvestrini
is restricted to written communication, she still
can't get the quote correct. Even when
Silvestrini could literally cut-and-paste the
quote from email, she still blows it.
Silvestrini had plenty of potential quotes in Dr. Curry's generous written
interview
yet, as is classic bad journalism, she
very selectively (misleadingly) gave
her readers only two short quotes, and she
misquoted one of those. That is a letter grade of "F"
with a failing 50% rating equivalent to flipping
a coin.
Silvestrini is guilty of ineffective assistance of reporting.
At a recent appellate hearing, Silvestrini was too unprofessional to even
attempt
to speak to Dr. Curry in person.
In a hilarious turn of events at the end of the appellate court hearing
on the case
that Silvestrini was covering, the appellate
court was informed that Silvestrini
had misquoted Dr. Curry. The Judges seemed
baffled about Silvestrini's behavior.
It was clear that none of the Judges were aware
of Silvestrini's article about the case. One Judge
openly stated that the Tampa Tribune was not a newspaper
read by the Judge, a remark that brought chuckles
of agreement from the courtroom. Dr. Curry told
the judge that he also does not read the Tampa Tribune,
and the audience's response increased. The only person
who did not laugh was probably Silvestrini.
And, of course, Silvestrini's readers did not receive the story because
Silvestrini
deliberately omitted it from the article
she wrote. Instead, Silvestrini wrote an
article about the appellate hearing that was
deliberately misleading in regard to what transpired
concerning her misquotation. Silvestrini did
not tell the whole truth.
In the same article, Silvestrini publicly admitted, in a sheepish manner,
that she
had misquoted Dr. Curry. And by "sheepish"
is meant that she continued to be
unforthright in her statements. Silvestrini
did not attempt to speak to Dr. Curry regarding
Silvestrini's later article, despite Silvestrini's
strange efforts to speak to Curry for Silvestrini's
earlier article. After the hearing, She did not
attempt to speak to Dr. Curry in person or communicate
in any way. Since the time she misquoted Dr. Curry
she has not communicated, not even attempting to do
so by email.
When the federal jurisdiction issue was addressed at the appellate hearing,
none of the
judges displayed the bizarre ignorance
of the topic that had been demonstrated
by Silvestrini in her article.
Nevertheless, the media debate challenge that was issued by Dr. Rex Curry
as
quoted by Silvestrini, is also available
to Silvestrini......if she thinks
that she is up to it.
Apparently, Silvestrini does not think
she is up to it as she has not selected
a time or place in response to the public
debate challenge. The only person Silvestrini
is fooling is herself. It is another media
debate challenge victory for Dr. Curry over Elaine
Silvestrini and the Tampa Tribune newspaper.
It was only after Silvestrini's behavior was publicly exposed that she
stopped.
Silvestrini misquoted Dr. Curry in Silvestrini's article when she wrote
that
Dr. Curry "said in an e-mail exchange that
he plans in his argument to the court
to quote from the book 'The Prosecution of
President George W. Bush for Murder' by the former
prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi." The email shows
that Silvestrini's comment is incorrect and that
Dr. Curry was wise to restrict Silvestrini to written
communication. Even when a Tampa Tribune reporter
like Silvestrini is restricted to written communication,
she still can't get the quote correct. Even when
Silvestrini could literally cut-and-paste the
quote from email, she still blows it.
Silvestrini had plenty of potential quotes in Dr. Curry's generous written
interview
yet, as is classic bad journalism, she
very selectively (misleadingly) gave
her readers only two short quotes, and she
misquoted one of those. That is a letter grade of "F"
with a failing 50% rating equivalent to flipping
a coin. Silvestrini later admitted her "error"
in public in a later article in the newspaper. She kinda
sorta had to admit the error because it was all done by email.
Does anyone think she would recollect it that way if it
had been by "talking"?
************************
Silvestrini is so out-of-touch with reality (and so defective as a "reporter")
that she does not
realize there ARE lawyers who carry guns
into courthouses, as well as
many other people who do. (P.S. please
don't help her wise up, as she will want
to disarm all of them).
************************
Silvestrini's
uninformative writing
is especially odd in light of an
earlier Tampa Tribune article concerning
Chief Judge Alex Kozinski being accused of posting
sexually explicit material onwebsite. On the
same topic see
http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/11/chief-judge-alex-kozinski-accused-of-posting-sexually-explicit-material-on-website/
and http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/jun/13/na-judge-calls-for-probe-of-his-porn-posting/
| The Tampa Tribune (and other local papers or incarnations) has been covering up for the pledge and flag fetishism for almost a century. "Francis M. Bellamy, Patriotic Writer, Dies" New York Times August 30, 1931. "Flag Pledge Author Dies at Home Here" Tampa Daily Times, August 29, 1931. "Author of Flag Pledge Dies at His Home Here" Tampa Tribune, August 29, 1931. "His Words Will Live Forever" Tampa Tribune, September 1, 1931 "This is Flag Day, Let's Take the Pledge Again" Tampa Daily Times, June 14, 1931. |
|
Another Tampa Tribune / St. Pete Times symbol shows the Tampa Tribune's T-cross combined with the St. Petersburg Times' S-cross, the hooked-cross swastika. http://rexcurry.net/swastika-tampa-tribune.jpg Dark T-letters form the S-letters of the lighter swastika (at the interior) and encircle it. It symbolizes how the two have the same deadly dogma of socialism, similar to that under the National Socialist German Workers Party. http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html |
Drawing
of Tampa Tribune newspaper boat at Gasparilla pirate festival
with swastika-style flag. Scale: actual size.Great job Rex – go get them! FYI, the Tampa Tribune’s Elaine Silvestrini is close to the Feds, the Federal prosecutor and FBI in particular. Indeed, the frequency with which her name appears on the Tribune’s local federal law enforcement related stories suggest that the Fed “law dogs” are her primary assignment – and of course, she has to feed her “pups”. Her ad hominem attack is an unprofessional - albeit typical - smear attempt. By speaking truth to power, you have just now correctly pointed out that the Emperor has no clothes. - Your Pal, O This article was really interesting, did not know you were on that case. Why did the reporter Elaine Silvestrini choose to write about it? Her motives were very unclear. She also seems quite uninformed about, and somewhat disinterested in, governmental intrusions on liberty. In addition, Silvestrini does not seem to grasp the role of an attorney. She seems to find it quite shocking that anyone would challenge the status quo. Very disappointed in her coverage, if she's going to be a reporter it would help to have an inquiring mind. - K |
|
You can lead a reporter to a story, but you can't make
him think. "Why is television (or the print media) called a medium? Because it is neither rare nor well-done." What is black and white and red all over? your daily newspaper. Q: What is the definition of an politician? A: Someone who claims to solve a problem you didn't know you had in a way you don't understand. Q: What is the definition of an journalist? A: Someone who writes about a politician solving a problem you didn't know you had in a way you don't understand. Q: When does a person decide to become a journalist? A: When he realizes he doesn't have the charisma to succeed as a politician. What do you call a handcuffed politician? Trustworthy. The usual follow up to "Journalists are the ones who come in after the battle and bayonet the wounded" is: Politicians are the ones who follow the journalists and strip the bodies. A totalitarian socialist invades the country and goes up to the first people he sees (a politician and a journalist) and says "I'm a totalitarian socialist and I just invaded to destroy your economy. What do you think about that?" The journalist replies "I don't think, I just write what the politician thinks." The journalist and the other totalitarian both look at the politician for a response. The politician glances about furtively and says "What would you like me to think about that?" What's the definition of a politician? It's a guy who will legislate the ways everyone can make love but he doesn't know any girls. A journalist sees a politician riding up on a new bicycle. So he stops the politician and asks where he bought the bike. The politician says "The funniest thing happened. A beautiful woman was pushing her bike past me, when suddenly she stops, takes off all her clothes and tells me to take what I want!!!!" Followup punchline to above: And the journalist says to the politician, "Good choice, her clothes wouldn't have fit you anyway!!" |
The stiff-arm salute developed from the "Pledge of Allegiance," written in 1892. Francis Bellamy (author of the "Pledge of Allegiance") and Edward Bellamy (author of the novel "Looking Backward") and Charles Bellamy (author of "A Moment of Madness") and Frederick Bellamy (who introduced Edward to socialistic "Fourierism") were socialists. Edward, Charles and Frederick were brothers, and Francis was their cousin. Francis and Edward were both self-proclaimed National Socialists and they supported the "Nationalism" movement in the USA, the "Nationalist" magazine, and the "Nationalist Educational Association." They wanted all of society to ape the military and they touted "military socialism" and the "industrial army." Edward’s book was an international bestseller, translated into every major language (including Italian & German) and he inspired the "Nationalist Party" (in the USA) and their dogma influenced socialists worldwide (including Italy & Germany) via “Nationalist Clubs.” The government in the USA and the government schools and the media hide those facts from people in the USA and from people in other countries. The U.S. still follows the similar anti libertarian policies. Many
Bellamy socialist policies were followed in
the USA and still are followed in the USA and caused
the USA’s big, expensive and oppressive government.
The government still owns and operates schools, including
the same schools that imposed segregation by law and taught racism
as official government policy. The U.S. practice of imposing
segregation by law in government schools and teaching racism
as official policy even outlasted Mussolini and Hitler by over
15 years. After segregation in government's schools ended, the
Bellamy legacy caused more police-state racism of forced busing
that destroyed communities and neighborhoods and deepened hostilities.
Those schools still exist. Infants are given social security numbers
that track and tax them for life. Those schools demand the numbers
to enroll. The Pledge still exists along with laws mandating that
teachers lead the robotic pledge chanting every day for twelve years
of each child’s life. |
In the summer of 2007 I had a conversation with a business associate/friend whose business involved using newspaper classified advertising for his business. He remarked to me that over an extended period of time he had given the Tampa Tribune many thousands of dollars in business. Yet, during that time the Tribune had constantly published columns of Daniel Ruth in which Ruth constantly wrote columns in which he disparaged many people in the community that my friend admired and supported. I jokingly teased him about the freedom of the press and such. He very somberly reminded me that there was a vast difference between freedom of expression and school yard name calling. He went on to say that he had written letters of complaint to the tribune without so much as an acknowledgement. After years of frustration he enlisted family members to explore alternatives to Tribune advertising. They decided that new media of the internet using classified sites such as Craig's List and local/regional advertising sites was their answer. They found that not only was it more effective but far cheaper. My friend was quite gleeful about his divorce from the Tribune advertising department. As for myself, being in a similar business my friend, I, too, have chaffed at the indifference of the Tribune toward the business I extended to them. Their seeming attitude was, "We are the only action in town for your type of business. So you take us and Daniel Ruth as is--like it or lump it!" Since that fateful conversation I had with my friend I have, also, moved all my business advertising into the new media. And am I ever glad I did. It has been most effective. Furthermore, I encourage any business that depends on this type of advertising to move to the new media. It is cheaper and there is far more competition for your business. You will not be sorry for your move. I used to wish that the Tampa Tribune would rid itself of the likes of Daniel Ruth. But I no longer wish for that. May the Tampa Tribune and Daniel Ruth remain together for as long as they both stay in business--which, I pray, will not be for long. - Kraba |
Webber, 40, answered U.S. District Court Judge Tom Varlan's questions but stood ramrod straight and quiet for most of the 30-minute hearing.
Webber is one of five former Campbell County lawmen charged with federal civil rights violations of Lester Eugene Siler, 42, of the White Oak community.
He was the first to appear in court; three others are due in court later this week. The fifth is yet to be scheduled.
They are charged with handcuffing and torturing Siler for two hours on July 8, 2004, demanding his drugs and money.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Atchley said none of the men deserved -- under federal law -- their freedom and asked Varlan to incarcerate them after their pleas.
Varlan agreed and ordered Webber to be taken into custody immediately. He is to be sentenced May 23.
Siler and members of his family were present in the courtroom.
Siler's attorneys said they were pleased with the outcome and will probably file a lawsuit within the next 30 days.
Webber, who headed narcotics investigations for Campbell County and is accused of being the ringleader in the alleged torture, pleaded guilty to an information charging him with conspiracy to violate Siler's civil rights.
Samuel Franklin, 42, a veteran detective at the agency and head of its D.A.R.E. program, is scheduled to plead guilty Wednesday, court records show. Rookie Deputy Joshua Monday, 24, and process server Shayne Green, 35, are expected to plead guilty Thursday, according to records.
The four lawmen and part-time process server William Carroll, 26, were named in federal informations filed earlier this month in U.S. District Court. They are accused of beating and torturing Siler after showing up at his house to serve a violation of probation warrant.
Part of the alleged attack was captured on an audiotape after Siler's wife, Jenny, stashed a tape recorder in the kitchen. An FBI transcript of the tape revealed in chilling detail how Siler was threatened, beaten and tortured, with deputies demanding two things from him: that he sign a form to show he agreed for his house to be searched and that he turn over to them all his cash and drugs.
Attorneys for Webber and Franklin filed motions asking Varlan to allow their clients to remain free pending sentencing hearings.
An attorney for Monday, who is not charged in the conspiracy but instead is accused of a separate count of pointing a gun at Siler and threatening to shoot him during Siler's ordeal, also wants his client freed until he is sentenced.
Attorney Lee Asbury argued in his motion that Webber, who lives in Anderson County, "has no prior criminal record" and "has never missed or been late for an appointment with the U.S. Attorney."
Webber, Asbury insisted, should be allowed his freedom because "he has at all times cooperated with the United States Attorney, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Department of Justice."
Asbury's motion does not note, however, that Webber is accused in state court charges of lying to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation in that agency's initial investigation of the incident.
Green, Monday and Franklin also are charged in state court with perjury. The four also face charges in Campbell County Criminal Court of official oppression. District Attorney General Paul Phillips has said state court charges likely will be dropped if the men wind up imprisoned in the federal case. Federal penalties are higher than any that might be handed out in state court, he has said.
Franklin's attorney, Andrew S. Roskind, contends Franklin only went to Siler's house at the request of Webber. Franklin, Roskind says, asked Siler's wife and son to leave the house and, along with the other four lawmen, demanded Siler sign the consent form.
"After making the request, Mr. Franklin threatened Mr. Siler with the use of a slapjack and breaking Mr. Siler's fingers," Roskind wrote. "Mr. Franklin never carried through with either threat nor did he allow one of the other four ... to use his slapjack or break Mr. Siler's fingers.
"Unfortunately and regrettably, although Mr. Franklin never physically harmed Mr. Siler, he failed to stop the other individuals from inflicting further ... harm and injury," Roskind continued.
Roskind contends in his motion that Franklin has served both Campbell County and his country -- he was once in the military -- admirably and deserves freedom pending sentencing because of that.
Monday's attorney, Dennis Francis, writes that his client has no prior criminal history and would agree to be electronically monitored if allowed to remain free.
Atchley counters that none of the men are entitled to freedom.
All, he wrote, will plead guilty to a "crime of violence" for which federal law requires immediate detention. The only exceptions to that law, Atchley noted, would come if the case against them was weak or the lawmen were likely to receive probation.
"The exceptions do not apply," Atchley wrote, indicating that he will indeed seek prison terms for the men.
As for Franklin, Atchley contends Franklin's service to Campbell County and the military does not set him apart from the garden-variety criminal.
"Even painting the defendant's employment history and military service
in
the best possible light, it seems a bit of
a stretch to state that these make
his personal character out of the ordinary,
uncommon and rare," Atchley wrote.
**********************
Elaine Silvestrini, Daniel Ruth, Tampa Tribune promote Flag Fetishism &
verbally fellating flags. See videos on Youtube below.
More layoffs and down-graded formatting are coming for the Tampa Tribune.
Partial blame goes to two Tribune
writers: Elaine Silvestrini and Daniel
Ruth. Partial credit goes to Dr. Rex Curry in exposing
the Tampa Tribune, Silvestrini and Ruth. The layoffs
follow mere weeks after Dr. Curry defeated the Tribune,
Silvestrini and Ruth in public debate challenges. Their
writing was part of a widespread problem at the newspaper.
Earlier Layoffs at the Tribune followed shortly after a previous
victory for Dr. Curry in exposing and defeating Daniel Ruth
(See any internet search for "Tampa Tribune lays off").
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
After Ruth's previous defeat the response against Ruth from the general
public was so great that Ruth
said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free market
statist $#%!&, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt,
stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist." Ruth publicly
apologized to Dr. Curry for Ruth's errors.
http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html
Ruth's apology was too late, as the Tribune
continued to twist down the toilet. Ruth and Silvestrini are causing spectators
to wager on when the Tribune will be out of business.
The Tribune is collapsing under the web,
and Dr. Curry's work is showing the way as Dr.
Curry's work is taking top spots on the web. A google
search for Elaine Silvestrini shows the # 1 spot (along
with the four top spots) is the RexCurry.net page (and
others) exposing her. A google image search for Elaine
Silvestrini shows the #1 and #2 spots are RexCurry.net web
page images. RexCurry.net also shows in searches for Daniel
Ruth. Videos expose them in the top spots in Youtube.com
searches for Elaine Silvestrini, Daniel Ruth, and Tampa Tribune.
For years, RexCurry.net has been the # 3 spot in a google
search for Daniel Ruth, after Ruth's previous humiliating
defeat, and that explains why Daniel the near-sighted leprechaun
remains turdly.
The Tampa Tribune perpetuates flag fetishism
and verbally fellating flags by repeating tired
cliches through reporters such as Silvestrini and
Ruth. They keep their readers ignorant. A youtube.com
video reveals more (Note that the views for
this Youtube video are over 18,000 views)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4
It is a reminder of the old saying: "To a
socialist/statist there is no bigger phallic symbol
than a flag pole."
Below are more videos and links that everyone
asked for exposing Daniel Ruth, Elaine Silvestrini
and the Tampa Tribune.
Elaine Silvestrini on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qByrqOHoKlI
Daniel Ruth on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TtqBuddbPk
Daniel Ruth web pages
http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html
http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html
http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html
Is Daniel "LaRouche La Ruth" the person known as Lyndon LaRouche? See the
photographic evidence at http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2898419047/
http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/GetRuthLess#5251477392223721010
Has anyone ever seen those two together?
Has the mystery of Ruth's hybrid toupee / combover question been solved?
(Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would
let the critic find out if Ruth has a hybrid toupee/combover
if the critic paid Ruth $5000 -Ruth knew that if
the price was high then the critic would pass on Ruth's toupee/combover
question).
See
the startling photographic evidence at http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg
Elaine Silvestrini web pages
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
Daniel Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini on a blog
http://getruthless.blogspot.com/
Google search for Elaine Silvestrini puts
RexCurry.net in top spot
http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=en&safe=off&q=elaine%20silvestrini&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw
Google search for Daniel Ruth puts RexCurry.net
in # 3
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=daniel+ruth&btnG=Google+Search
Google image search for Elaine Silvestrini
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=elaine+silvestrini&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2
Flickr image for Elaine Silvestrini
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2861433181/
Flickr image for Daniel Ruth
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2862262750/
Flickr image for Tampa Tribune
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7894913@N08/2862262750/
Picasa image album
http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/PledgeOfAllegianceIsNazismSwastikaSLettersForSocialism02#
Picasa image search for Elaine Silvestrini
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/view?q=elaine+silvestrini&uname=rexcurrydotnet&psc=G&cuname=rexcurrydotnet&filter=1#
Picasa image for Elaine Silvestrini
http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/PledgeOfAllegianceIsNazismSwastikaSLettersForSocialism02#5065541373021292210
Picasa image for Daniel Ruth
http://picasaweb.google.com/rexcurrydotnet/PledgeOfAllegianceIsNazismSwastikaSLettersForSocialism02#5065541368726324898
Technorati
http://technorati.com/videos/youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DBssWWZ3XEe4
Audio on odeo
http://odeo.com/channels/339443
Here is an excerpt: Think of the Tampa Tribune
as a torture and terrorism conspiracy (as
its readers think of it; both of them). That
makes Elaine
Silvestrini a co-conspirator
with Daniel Ruth, another Trib twit.
After Ruth's previous loss to Dr. Curry, the
response against Ruth from the
general public was so great
that Ruth said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free
market statist $#@%!&@, Dummkopf,
liberal, daffy, dolt,
stupid, dunce and, oh by
the way, socialist." http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html
Ruth's use of "socialist" is very telling in that Ruth continues to cover-up
for the National Socialist
German Workers Party and its deadly
dogma. Ruth has probably
never written the actual name of the group
"National Socialist German Workers Party"
ever in the Tribune
(check it yourself). Ruth
writes flippantly about torture. Good Grief,
Lyndon LaRouche was not as delusional as Ruth
is. For many years,
the loopy leprechaun (Ruth)
has flittered about the fringes of political
life in the Tampa Bay area as a sort of scary
class clown, in the
"special" section, hoping
that his kindergarten cracks will make his
teachers give up and leave him alone. Ruth's insane
clown posse act
is like something out of
"Apocalypse Now" meets "A Clockwork Orange."
He is the Rump-hole of the Insanely. http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html
In that way, the Tampa Tribune
promotes and perpetuates flag fetishism
by repeating tired propaganda through reporters
such as Ruth
and Silvestrini. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
It is no wonder that their
columns never state any qualifications
they have to write articles about the topic (or
any articles). Only their
phone numbers and email
addresses were given with no biographical
or background information (nor any link to
such information). There
is a complete lack of disclosure
of whether they have any licensing or
educational achievement that qualifies them
to write on such a
topic, how they were selected,
nor how much they were paid to write (It
might embarrass them if they printed what they
were
paid). They both learned
to write in government schools on Planet
Zircon 9. She is the Touch-hole of the Insanely.
Compared to Dr. Curry's illustrious career,
Silvestrini's name is longer than her career highlights.
One suspects that Silvestrini's flatulence worsens
every time she rubs her brain cells together. Both
of them.
As a career move, they should
not become lawyers. Their "journalism"
might cause some people to wonder if they are
competent even
to write about legal issues,
or to write at all about anything. If
they are considering a career change to law then
here is a Memo to Daniel
Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini:
Don't start packing your bags.
They submit to robotic chanting
in worship of the state because it is so
much like their writing: robotic repetition of
claptrap that is learned
from the government and
taught in government schools (socialist
schools). http://rexcurry.net/silvestrini-elaine-tampa-tribune.jpg
Silvestrini and Ruth remain
unable or unwilling to state the simple
issue: The Pledge of Allegiance (and its author)
was the origin of the
salute of the National Socialist
German Workers Party and influenced
its symbols and rituals. They are deniers and
historical revisionists.
Are all Tribune writers
that dense or does intellectual dishonesty
and a lack of integrity make them unwilling
to provide simple accurate
reporting?
On the other hand, Elaine
Silvestrini has strange tastes in what
she does write about. In a recent article, Silvestrini's
interests were drawn
to "adults only" web pages
about swastika and flag fetishism; On 7-3-07,
Silvestrini wrote about a man who sells virtual
sex toys,
including characters on
screen that can be animated into a variety
of sexual positions; Silvestrini has written repeatedly
about what
Silvestrini calls a "high-profile
drug, sex and torture case."
If you read newspapers for
years then you will see all manner of ditzoid
craziness that slops its way over the journalistic
gunwales -claims
of UFO abductions, the conspiracy
theorists, Nazi cabals, deranged threatening
environmentalists and people who believe
monkeys are
taking over the world.
And those are just some
of the serious news stories in newspapers.
There are some newspaper writers, too, who
are really weird. Take Ruth and
Silvestrini. Please, take
them.
For all the bizarre black
helicopter sightings and strange arguments
that Shecky Green and the Jewish lobby control
the government and Y2K means the end
of the world, the most twistedly
evasive work comes from Ruth and Silvestrini.
The Felliniesque Fidel Castros
never addressed any of the original issues.
For example, why is the federal government growing
so large,
taking over criminal law
nationwide, and becoming involved in what
were historically state-level cases? Lame
Silvestrini - a "newspaper"
writer - weighed in
with one long sputtering bluster against
reality. Ruth did his mental blank-out. The Karl
Marx duo of the Twilight Zone
responded with a bunch of
journalistic babble.
Silvestrini and Ruth are
two of the most visible local disciples
of the Tampa Tribune, which ought to have their
embarrassed fellow
travelers donning Groucho
Marx disguises around the office and about
town.
Recently when Silvestrini
wrote again about "high-profile drugs,
sex and torture," Silvestrini mentioned Dr. Curry,
and his appellate work
as an attorney for a defendant
in whom Silvestrini has taken an ongoing
interest. Silvestrini wrote about two critics
of Curry's work and
then she quoted Curry's
response, "You can write that I have challenged
them to a public debate of their claims and that
the next step is
to select a time and place
for doing so, if they think they are up to
it." http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
Silvestrini's quote was
a public debate challenge by Dr. Curry to
Charles Rose, a professor at Stetson Law School,
and the dare was
printed in the Tampa Tribune
Newspaper on September 6, 2008. A law
school would be an ideal place for an educational
debate and it
would be easy for Charles
Rose to arrange it. As expected, Charles
Rose apparently did not think he was up to it
as Charles Rose has
not selected a time or place
in response to Dr. Curry's public debate
challenge.
Even after Elaine Silvestrini
printed the debate challenge to Charles
Rose in the newspaper, there was no response
from Rose that
Silvestrini printed in the
article. It remains another media debate
challenge victory for Dr. Curry over Charles Rose.
The media debate challenge
that was issued by Dr. Rex Curry as quoted
by Silvestrini, is also available to Silvestrini
and Ruth......if either
thinks that he/she is up
to it. Apparently, they don't think they
are up to it as neither has not selected a time
or place in response to the
public debate challenge.
They are only fooling themselves.
It is another media debate
challenge victory for Dr. Curry over Daniel
Ruth, Elaine Silvestrini and the Tampa Tribune
newspaper.
It was only after Silvestrini's behavior was publicly exposed that she
stopped.
Silvestrini misquoted Dr. Curry in Silvestrini's article when she wrote
that
Dr. Curry "said in an e-mail exchange that
he plans in his argument to the court
to quote from the book 'The Prosecution of
President George W. Bush for Murder' by the former
prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi." The email shows
that Silvestrini's comment is incorrect and that
Dr. Curry was wise to restrict Silvestrini to written
communication. Even when a Tampa Tribune reporter
like Silvestrini is restricted to written communication,
she still can't get the quote correct. Even when
Silvestrini could literally cut-and-paste the
quote from email, she still blows it. Silvestrini
later admitted her "error" in public in a later article
in the newspaper. She kinda sorta had to admit the error
because it was all done by email. Does anyone think she would
recollect it that way if it had been by "talking"?
Silvestrini had plenty of potential quotes in Dr. Curry's generous written
interview
yet, as is classic bad journalism, she
very selectively (misleadingly) gave
her readers only two short quotes, and she
misquoted one of those. That is a letter grade of "F"
with a failing 50% rating equivalent to flipping
a coin.
