DR. REX CURRY IS VICTOR IN ANOTHER DEBATE CHALLENGE
in Ancient/Classical History Forum
HISTORIANS CONFIRM NEW DISCOVERIES BY PROFESSOR
CURRY ?
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
A recent scholarly debate challenge confirms new discoveries regarding symbolism
and salutes under the horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party. Dr.
Rex Curry is the victor in a recent debate challenge over N. S. Gill and
Irene Hahn. The debate topic concerned Dr. Curry's new discoveries about
swastika symbolism (see
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html
). Neither Gill nor Hahn disputed Dr. Curry's work. Gill and Hahn
are hosts of an Ancient/Classical History Forum. Hahn is also webmaster
for the Stamford Historical Society (U.S.) and Gill is a Latinist and a lifelong
student of ancient history. Gill and Hahn join the growing recognition in
academia of Professor Curry's ground-breaking work.
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html
Professor Curry showed that the swastika, although an ancient symbol, was
sometimes used by Nazis as meshed "S" letters for the "socialism" of the
horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party.
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a.html
Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized "S" letter
for "socialist"
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a4.html
and similar alphabetic symbolism still shows on Volkswagens.
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a2a.html
Curry changed the way that people view the symbol of the National Socialist
German Workers' Party.
http://rexcurry.net/swastika3swastika.jpg
Dr. Curry is also the victor in another debate challenge over Irene Hahn
concerning the "Roman" salute. The debate topic was Dr. Curry's discoveries
concerning the "ancient Roman salute" myth:
1. Dr. Curry showed that the USA's first Pledge of Allegiance used a straight-arm
salute and it was the origin of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist
German Workers' Party (Nazis).
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
Professor Curry helped to establish that it was not an ancient Roman salute,
and that the "ancient Roman salute" is a myth.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched out toward
the flag. Historic photographs are at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
and at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html
Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the
Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute.
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
3. Francis Bellamy (author of the "Pledge of Allegiance") and Edward Bellamy
(author of the novel "Looking Backward") and Charles Bellamy (author of "A
Moment of Madness") were socialists. Edward and Charles were brothers,
and Francis was their cousin. Francis and Edward were both self-proclaimed
National Socialists and they supported the "Nationalism" movement in the
USA, the "Nationalist" magazine, the "Nationalist Educational Association,"
and their dogma of "military socialism," and Edward inspired the "Nationalist
Party" (in the USA) and their dogma influenced socialists in Germany,
http://rexcurry.net/bellamy-edward-german-connections.html
and the Pledge was the origin of the Nazi salute.
In Dr. Curry's spirit of good sportsmanship, he is making the same debate
challenge to N. S. Gill regarding the "Roman" salute myth. Please encourage
N.S. Gill to accept Dr. Curry's challenge to the new debate.
Dr. Curry's first debate victory over Gill and Hahn arose after Gill and
Hahn participated in forum discussions concerning ancient and modern interpretations
of the swastika symbol. At first, Curry was puzzled about why Gill and
Hahn would discuss modern myths about the swastik in a forum about ancient
and classical history. Gill was the moderator of the forum and as moderator
Gill had posted the following question from a forum member: "Does anyone know
why the Swastika symbol is tilted 45 degrees by the Nazi's? They also
use clock and counter clock wise symbols at the same time. Was this due to
negligence or did it have specific reasons?" Dr. Curry graciously attempted
to assist Gill and Hahn by answering that question and related questions,
because Dr. Curry's historical work discovered the answer. Dr. Curry's direct
answers to the direct questions on the forum mysteriously disappeared.
Dr. Curry contacted Gill and Hahn, questioning the apparent intellectual
dishonesty in the forum. It turned out that Gill anonymously and without
explanation deleted Dr. Curry's direct answers to the forum's direct questions.
Thereafter, a debate challenge was arranged, with Dr. Curry against
Gill and Hahn. Dr. Curry was the victor.
Gill is a freelance writer in the Twin Cities and her articles have appeared
in newspapers (including the Pioneer Press and Star Tribune) and homeschooling
magazines across the country. Perhaps, her debate loss to Professor
Curry will inspire Gill to write about her new knowledge of historic symbolism,
and share that knowledge with readers everywhere.
Similar to Dr. Curry, Gill is a lifelong student of ancient history. Gill
claims to frown upon self-promotion, however, the following information is
only a part of what is listed next to her photos at the forum: As an undergraduate,
Gill studied Classics at The University of Chicago and The University of Minnesota.
She continued with Latin in graduate school at the University of Minnesota.
Gill's Masters papers dealt with the mistaken dating of an Oxyrrhynchus papyrus
and the structure of Ovid's Ars Amatoria.
Here is a quote from Gill: "....I hope to shake the dust out of history
by making it lively, relevant, and entertaining for everyone. In particular,
rather than looking for sites that only scholars can understand, I am looking
for sites that will stimulate a lifelong interest in history for children
and adults." And Dr. Curry shares those goals. However, Gill's
quote contrasts with Dr. Curry's experience in the forum that Gill and Hahn
host, and where Gill anonymously and without explanation deleted Dr. Curry's
direct answers to the forum's direct questions.
Gill has lived in the Minneapolis / St. Paul, MN area since 1970 and
she says it is "a culture where people are so nice it can cause problems."
It is a quote that contrasts with Dr. Curry's experience in the forum
that Gill and Hahn host, and where Gill anonymously and without explanation
deleted Dr. Curry's direct answers to the forum's direct questions.
Hahn also hosts a Roman History Reading Group.
*****************************
TumartHOSTAA is the intellectually dishonest Assistant Moderator of an Agnosticism/Atheism
forum.
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html
Like many forum moderators, TumartHOSTAA does his dirty work anonymously,
hiding behind a pen-name and posting no additional information in his profile.
Tumart blocks valid responses to the personal attacks and kookiness of his
forum “pals." But Tumart does not delete the personal attacks and kookiness
of his “pals.” Tumart protects the personal attacks and kookiness of his “pals.”
Tumart blocks accurate information about the discoveries by Dr. Rex Curry
that expose the history of Nazism in the USA. Tumart's behavior is
similar to that of neo-Nazis who cover up for the National Socialist German
Workers’ Party.
Respondents who post off-topic insults deserve to be mocked with their insults
thrown back to them. Therefore, Tumart: First, desist accusing Dr. Curry
of simply copying and pasting webpages on this forum. Dr. Curry's
discoveries introduced a topic for debate. This forum is not
the soapbox for people who post off-topic insults. They may not simply
wallpaper off-topic insults as posts or responses. If you paid any
attention to what was happening, or if you were not intellectually dishonest,
then you would warn the respondents to Dr. Curry's topic or gag or ban them.
You simply reveal yourself.
Second, as you noted yourself in your response, the moderator of About Ancient/Classical
History was also intellectually dishonest, showing the same failure to reason
that you do. As you know, that is almost certainly because she knew
Dr. Curry to be correct and she had no response, but did not want her forum
to know the truth. You know this because she was specifically challenged
to a debate and lost. Your comments otherwise are known to be incorrect.
That is also why the episode is retold on a webpage. Tumart, you know
Dr. Curry to be correct and you have no response, but you do not want your
forum to know the truth.
The dishonesty that exists in Tumart's forum and in other forums does not
go without response elsewhere. And whenever any forum moderator (such
as Tumart) deliberately protects off-topic insults and deletes the truth,
and prevents a response on Dr. Curry's behalf, then that moderator will also
have a response on other webpages and multiple searchable locations where
that moderator will be able to view that moderator being exposed and that
moderator will not be allowed to respond either, so that the moderator will
receive the same treatment in return. So long as you demonstrate a willingness
to engage in rational debate about Dr. Curry's discoveries and so long as
you threaten those who post off-topic insults (instead of threatening anyone
who responds to those off-topic insults by repeating the insults back to
their originators, mocking their inability to debate), then you have the benefit
of the doubt.
Additional note: Which benefit of a doubt you no longer have, given
your inability to perceive the trolling behavior of off-topic insults
in this thread to which you issue no condemnation of those who originate the
insults, and instead you threaten the person who responds in kind to off-topic
insults. You must be blind and intellectually dishonest.
Good-bye. If this unfair and intellectually dishonest behavior persists
then you can look for additional responses on this webpage and elswhere.
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html
*************************
A dishonest host has apparently blocked responses therefore the responses
were posted elsewhere on the web. Some of those posts will not be found
by the host that they expose (so the host will not be able to delete them).
Others posts will be found, but it will not be possible for the host
or others to respond. It is hoped that they enjoy the reciprocal treatment.
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html
Respondents who post off-topic insults deserve to be mocked with their insults
thrown back to them. Therefore: Tan-Man (Tanron2) Leave.
Now. And don't try to pull this sh*t on me either.
**************************
Thank you Andi03 for conceding that you have no knowledge about what happened.
You should have the utmost disrespect for Mr. Tumart as a moderator as what
he did is clear, whether you choose to not look at it. That is why tumart
and the other intellectually dishonest people at about.com are addressed at
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html About.com is too intellectually
dishonest to allow information like that. This discussion was closed to posting
and that shows that you are also intellectually dishonest, so that you have
been added to the website, Andi03 along with nganga2 (nganga21 or Karen).
Thank you for conceding that you are supremely unsure about what happened.
Pretending otherwise does not change the fact that you know nothing about
what you write. As you note, people who want to hide behind their dirty
work have the "right" not to fill out all of the information asked in the
profile, this is the prerogative of anyone who wants to hide while he does
his dirty work. Thank you for conceding that point again. The forum
HATES truthful responses and opinions and posters that say that they are
wrong when they are shown as such and you know that is the case because you
have read of this incident under discussion and you can see what happened
if you bother to look, you have no evidence to the contrary and pretending
otherwise does not change the facts for you no matter what you wish to write.
If you show them respect "over there" and notify them of Dr. Curry's discoveries
then they will post off-topic insults to you and if you respond they will
ban you. Try it and see. Your problem is you have nothing intersting
to say so you do not ever disagree with them in any important way.
It is electronic community etiquette to leave the other forums' business
in other forums, so thanks for conceding that point also. And as usual you
pretend that this has no relevance to you or this forum and you intend to
do nothing about it but to pretend it didn't happen and post your imaginary
ideas.
Citizen12 did not know that the USA's first Pledge of
Allegiance used a straight-arm gesture
http://rexcurry.net/semiskimmed-rob-hinkley.html
and that it was the origin of the gesture of the monstrous National Socialist
German Workers' Party
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
as discovered by Dr.
Rex Curry.
Citizen12 did not even know that "Nazi" means "National Socialist German
Workers' Party." Thanks for conceding all of Dr. Curry's points
and for not disputing a word of it. Of course, you embarassed yourself
by telling everyone how igorant you were and how you have just been schooled,
and that you have no response.
Respondents who post off-topic insults deserve to be
mocked with their insults thrown back to them.
Therefore, citizen12: You are persecuted everywhere you go, it
seems. You cannot figure it out. Actually, that was both an insult
and sarcasm for citizen12. Now citizen12 doesn't even make sense.
He has been persecuted and there is so much that he tries to figure out but
can't. Besides, it is likely that anyone would consider persecuting
him, since everyone
loathes him. Just ask if you don't believe
it. And thanks again for conceding that Dr. Curry is correct.
See how your game works citizen12? Enjoy being
mocked? Is it as funny when someone repeats your trash to you as when
you post your trash?
********************************
A recent scholarly debate challenge confirms new discoveries regarding symbolism
and salutes under the horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party. Dr.
Rex Curry is the victor in a recent debate challenge over Ms. Jennifer Rose
Emick and Mr. Tatarize. The debate topic concerned Dr. Curry's new discoveries
about swastika symbolism (see
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html
). Neither Ms. Emick nor Mr. Tatarize disputed Dr. Curry's work. Emick
is a guide or host of an Alternative Religions Forum and a self-described
artist, writer, and religious educator. Tatarize is unemployed. Emick and
Tatarize join the growing recognition in academia of Professor Curry's ground-breaking
work.
http://rexcurry.net/debate-rex-curry.html
Professor Curry showed that the swastika, although an ancient symbol, was
sometimes used by Nazis as meshed "S" letters for the "socialism" of the
horrid National Socialist German Workers' Party.
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a.html
Hitler altered his own signature to use the same stylized "S" letter
for "socialist"
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a4.html
and similar alphabetic symbolism still shows on Volkswagens.
http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a2a.html
Curry changed the way that people view the symbol of the National Socialist
German Workers' Party.
In Dr. Curry's spirit of good sportsmanship, he is making the same debate
challenge to Emick and Tatarize regarding the "Roman" salute myth. Please
encourage them to accept Dr. Curry's challenge to the new debate.
1. Dr. Curry showed that the USA's first Pledge of Allegiance used a straight-arm
salute and it was the origin of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist
German Workers' Party (Nazis). Professor Curry helped to establish that it
was not an ancient Roman salute, and that the "ancient Roman salute" is a
myth.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
2. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched out toward
the flag. Historic photographs are at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
and at
http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html
Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the
Nazi salute. The Nazi salute is an extended military salute.
http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html
3. Francis Bellamy (author of the "Pledge of Allegiance") and Edward Bellamy
(author of the novel "Looking Backward") and Charles Bellamy (author of "A
Moment of Madness") were socialists. Edward and Charles were brothers,
and Francis was their cousin. Francis and Edward were both self-proclaimed
National Socialists and they supported the "Nationalism" movement in the
USA, the "Nationalist" magazine, the "Nationalist Educational Association,"
and their dogma of "military socialism," and Edward inspired the "Nationalist
Party" (in the USA) and their dogma influenced socialists in Germany,
http://rexcurry.net/bellamy-edward-german-connections.html
and the Pledge was the origin of the Nazi salute.
Dr. Curry's first debate victory over Emick and Tatarize arose after Emick
and Tatarize attempted to participate in forum discussions concerning symbols
and symbolism and about the swastika symbol. Dr. Curry graciously assisted
the forum participants by answering questions, because Dr. Curry's historical
work is related to the topic. Dr. Curry's comments were met with odd
comments from the unemployed Mr. Tatarize, and Dr. Curry responded appropriately.
Emick then tried to cover-up for Mr. Tatarize and for her own ignorance.
Both of them were asked about the apparent intellectual dishonesty in
the forum. Thereafter, the debate victory was announced with Dr. Curry
as the victor over Ms. Emick and Mr. Tatarize.
Emick is a self-described writer and "religious educator," and it is hoped
that her debate loss to Professor Curry will inspire Emick to write about
her new knowledge of historic symbolism, and share that knowledge with readers
everywhere.
Here is a quote from Jennifer Emick: "Tolerance of the views and beliefs
of others is the first step toward understanding; understanding is the first
step toward peace. Tolerance does not mean accepting another person's beliefs,
but accepting their right to have those beliefs." And Dr. Curry shares
those goals. However, Emick's quote contrasts with Dr. Curry's experience
in the forum that Emick "guides."
Jennifer Rose Emick, consider this a warning- if you continue to conduct
yourself in the way of protecting people who initiate insults and who do
not address the topic, then you will be reported for your dishonesty
without a second thought. Further, you have conducted the same
grotesque conduct in that you have failed to address the topic.
Instead, you are trying to suppress the actual topic and discussion
by issuing threats against the on-topic remarks and those remarks that respond
to people who initiate insults and that respond to people (like you) who
protect others who initiate insults, while you also fail to address
the topic. How intellectually dishonest are you? By your
very own statement you are a fancy pants elitist. You are involved with
a group known as "alternative spirituality" and yet you protect those who
initiate insults, threaten those who respond to insults, fail to take action
against those who initiate insults, and you fail to address the topic yourself.
You are simply out-witted, you know you are wrong and you know that the only
way you can save face is delete posts that expose you and your cohort.
You do deserve to be thanked for conceding defeat in your debate (and by
the concession that Mr. Tatarize was also defeated) regarding Dr. Curry's
work. Due to your comments after your loss, you will be treated in
a reciprocal manner. If you continue to conduct yourself in that way, then
you will not be allowed to respond to the debate victory announcement in
the forums where it will be posted and you will not even be informed of those
forums, and any attempts by you to respond will be dropped without a second
thought.
ABOUT.COM, N.S. Gill, Irene Hahn Jennifer Rose Emick, Mr. Tatarize meet
defeat.
CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE of PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
ABOUT.COM, N.S. Gill, Irene Hahn Jennifer Rose Emick, Mr. Tatarize are
defeated in debate challenge.
Swastika
http://rexcurry.net/swastika3swastika.jpg
Swastika
ABOUT.COM, N.S. Gill, Irene Hahn Jennifer Rose Emick, Mr. Tatarize are defeated
in debate challenge.
Swastika
http://rexcurry.net/swastika3swastika.jpg
Swastika