DANIEL RUTH exposed by Dr. Rex Curry in public debate challenge !!  http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-elaine-silvestrini.jpg

Pledge of Allegiance to the flag The USA's Pledge of Allegiance (& the military salute) was the origin of Adolf Hitler's "Nazi" salute under the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis). http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html

The swastika was used by the military and by socialists in the USA and in the USSR, before it was used by the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP).
http://rexcurry.net/45th-infantry-division-swastika-sooner-soldiers.html
The swastika, although an ancient symbol, was also used to represent "S" letters joined for "socialism" under the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis), similar to the alphabetical symbolism for the SS Division, the SA, the NSV, and the VW logo (the letters "V" and "W" joined for "Volkswagen"). http://rexcurry.net/bookchapter4a1a2a1.html
Francis Bellamy & Edward Bellamy touted National Socialism and the police state in the USA decades before their dogma was exported to Germany. They influenced the NSDAP, its dogma, symbols and rituals. http://rexcurry.net/police-state.html

Elaine Silvestrini, Tampa Tribune concedes that Dr. Rex Curry's work is correct ! http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html
Photo
http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Daniel Ruth http://rexcurry.net/silvestrini-elaine-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Elaine Silvestrini
Daniel Ruth LaRouche publicly humiliated (again!). Ruth canned & Tribune collapsing http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html
Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins. Elaine Silvestrini


Uh, Daniel Ruth? Start Packing Your Bags !!


More layoffs and down-graded formatting are coming for the Tampa Tribune. Partial blame goes to two Tribune employees: Daniel Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini. Partial credit goes to Dr. Rex Curry in exposing the Tampa Tribune, Silvestrini and Ruth. The layoffs follow mere weeks after Dr. Curry defeated the Tribune, Silvestrini and Ruth in public debate challenges. That coincides with the time when the newspaper said: "Uh, Daniel Ruth? Start packing your bags!" http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-elaine-silvestrini.jpg

Silvestrini and Ruth are part of a widespread problem at the newspaper. Earlier Layoffs at the Tribune followed shortly after a previous victory for Dr. Curry over Ruth (See any internet search for "Tampa Tribune lays off"). http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-tampa-tribune.html

After Ruth's previous loss the response against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free market statist $#%!&, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist." Ruth publicly apologized to Dr. Curry for Ruth's errors. http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html

On another occasion, Ruth admitted publicly that locals have labeled him "bigot, prejudiced, hateful and ignorant" among many other similar insults. http://danielruthnews.wordpress.com/

Ruth's apology was too late, as the Tribune continued to twist down the toilet. Ruth and Silvestrini are causing spectators to wager on when the Tribune will be out of business. http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html

That is why the Tampa Tribune said: "Uh, Daniel Ruth? Start packing your bags!" http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg

The Tribune is collapsing under the internet and under Dr. Curry's internet work (taking top spots on the web for exposing Silvestrini, Ruth and the Tribune). Silvestrini and Ruth are learning the hard way why the Tribune is losing under the web. A google search for Elaine Silvestrini shows that top spots are the RexCurry.net page (and others) exposing her. A google image search for Elaine Silvestrini shows similar results. Similar resullts show in searches for Daniel Ruth. Videos expose them in the top spots in searches on Youtube.com for Elaine Silvestrini, Daniel Ruth, and Tampa Tribune. For years, RexCurry.net has been a top spot in a google search for Daniel Ruth, after Ruth's previous humiliating defeat, and that explains why Daniel the near-sighted loopy leperchaun [sic] remains sour. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4

And another video regarding Daniel Ruth http://www.encyclopedia.com/video/qByrqOHoKlI-tampa-tribune-elaine-silvestrini-swastika.aspx

Daniel Ruth: Price Gouging is good. Anti gouging laws are bad.
DANIEL RUTH & PRICE GOUGING

    One of the first "media debate" dares occurred when Dr. Rex Curry publicly issued a challenge to newspaper columnist Daniel Ruth to debate Ruth's column in which Ruth condemned economic freedom (what Ruth calls "price gouging").  http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html  The response against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free market statist $#@%!&@, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist." In a second column Ruth, humiliated by Curry's debate dare, wouldn’t debate and issued a public apology to Curry regarding Ruth's earlier column. A pic of Rex's debate shirt is at http://rexcurry.net/ruthgouge.jpg
    Below is the famous parody/rebuttal of  Daniel Ruth's loopy attack against a free market economy.

  

Daniel Ruth: A Statist, and a journalist, too! http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html

If you read newspapers for years then you will see all manner of ditzoid craziness that slops its way over the journalistic gunwales -claims of UFO abductions, the conspiracy theorists, Nazi cabals, and people who believe monkeys are taking over the world.

And those are just some of the serious news stories. There are some newspaper writers, too, who are really weird. Take Daniel Ruth. Please, take him.

For all the black helicopter sightings and strange arguments that Shecky Green and the Jewish lobby control the government and Y2K means the end of the world, Ruth's work is perhaps the most twistedly evasive.

Daniel Ruth - a newspaper columnist - weighed in with one long sputtering bluster against free market economics (what Ruth calls “price gouging” - a term Ruth never defines).  Ruth wanted to comment on disaster conditions such as those after Hurricane Andrew devastated the city of Homestead in south Florida.

You have to wonder what schools Ruth went to.  Government schools?  The government taught him everything it knows and he is still stupid.  But that is statist quo.

Ruth is also one of the most visible local disciples of the Tampa Tribune, which ought to have his embarrassed fellow travelers donning Groucho Marx disguises around the office and about town.

    Responding to a recent criticism of the filing of more than 500 price-gouging complaints to Florida law enforcement after Hurricane Floyd, Ruth asked a supporter of free market economics the following question:
    “If Tampa had been devastated by a hurricane and you  had to stand in line for three hours to buy ice for $50-a-bag, or sit in line for four hours to buy gas at $5-a-gallon, I wonder just how devotedly Libertarian you would be.”

    Ruth demonstrated by his question his utter lack of comprehension of the issue.  Thereafter, Ruth fell into his ruthless mental silence when the free marketeer attempted to show Ruth the stupidity of Ruth's question by asking Ruth: “If Tampa had been devastated by a hurricane and you had to stand in line for 6 hours (instead of 3) to buy ice for its government imposed price, or sit in line for 8 hours (instead of 4) to buy gas at its government controlled price, or if you actually had to go without the above, and building materials, bread, etc, because there wasn't any to buy at government imposed prices, I wonder just how devotedly socialistic/statist (or however you describe yourself) you would be.”

    By the way, Ruth also seems to believe that people who hoard goods in advance of a disaster should be arrested. Why? It's just too ... too ... loopy.   Reached by phone, Loopy Ruth did his mental blank out when asked whether his support of arresting price gougers also translated into his support for arresting hoarders.  Of course, Ruth's reasoning against his perpetually undefined “price gouging” does justify (and has justified) prohibiting hoarding, arresting consumers who hoard, confiscating their goods, and imposing rationing and general economic socialism, with any disaster as the pretense.  Ruth's brain doesn't travel that far, though.  Indeed, it doesn't even travel far enough to suspect that some people who hoard before a disaster are the people who are gouging after a disaster.

    This space was curious. Since Ruth, the lazy statist from hell, thinks laws against price gouging are so swell, how would he feel if he had to wait longer hours to buy a bag of ice for a government-controlled price, or discover that there was no gas at the government-controlled price?

    The Karl Marx of the Twilight Zone responded with a bunch of journalistic babble about injustice in modern America and an attack on free market economics, concluding by accusing this space of being libertarian.  I assume that's bad.

    Still the Felliniesque Fidel Castro had never answered the original question.

    Ruth pondered another simple query: How would he feel if he personally knew of people taking goods into a disaster area to sell them at prices that were higher than before the disaster?  He'd be happy to see them arrested, or to see them personally suffer violence at the hands of statist vigilantes (or maybe both?).  

Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins

    Indeed, it was evident that it had never entered Ruth's mind, after Hurricane Andrew, to load up a truck with a bunch of necessities, rush into a disaster area and sell people whatever they needed and wanted for whatever they would gladly pay.

    This proves three things. A) Statists are greedy, lazy %$#!@?$!#+ who won't help others, and who will take property from others, and they are nasty people who will use government to get their way. And B) For all his economic claptrap, Daniel Ruth is completely clueless if he thinks no one can go into a disaster area to charge people extra for goods for which they would gladly pay; and C) There is a reason why it never occurs to people like Ruth to load up a truck and drive into any disaster area  --but Ruth will never figure out what that reason is, or how it is related to his naive, statist keister and his willingness to kick others around while he whines for more government, in the safety of his cubicle, far from any disaster area.

    As well, irrespective of inane statist economic theories or statutes, all laws against price gouging are simply morally wrong because they worsen the circumstances of people when they are at their lowest emotional and financial ebb, forcing them to go without or to endure longer lines and bigger shortages.

    It is an essential cornerstone of statists to promote and defend the role of government in virtually all aspects of life. That sounds fine until the socialist bureaucrats arrive to pick away at human pride with their economic disasters before, during and after a natural disaster.

    The irony, of course, is that one of the reasons we have so much prosperity and abundance, even with Ruth's perpetually undefined “price-gouging”, is because a free market protects the public against the likes of the Daniel Ruth's of the world.

    For not only is Ruth a writer with a big public forum, his reasoning is that of half-baked socialism/statism.  Terrifying.


For more on Ruth's defeat in a public debate challenge see
 http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html


Dan Ruth St. Petersburg Times Socialism
Dan Ruth http://rexcurry.net/DAN-RUTH-socialism.jpg
Charlie Chaplin disquise


Other descriptions of Daniel Ruth's ignorance:
"News media throughout the United States and especially here in the southeast have been reporting extensively on gasoline shortages. Over 90% of service stations are without gas at any one time in the metro Atlanta area. When a supply truck arrives, car drivers drive long distances and wait in lines 10 or more cars long, blocking roads and intersections to get gas, typically exhausting the station’s new supply within hours. The media also reports on Georgia laws against gas price "gouging" – whereby stations attempting to sell gas at an undefined "too high" price can be subject to $15,000 penalties; other states in the southeast have similar laws. The news media, however, neglect to point out how these two issues are necessarily connected."  from Government Gouging  by Aaron Bilger 9-29-08

And federal appeals court judge Richard Posner said on his blog in 2007  in the wake of Hurricane Katrina that calls for anti-gouging laws reflect “sheer ignorance of basic economics (a failure of our educational system) and demagogic appeals by politicians to that ignorance.”

For a blog about Ruthless stupidity from Daniel Ruth see
 http://www.getruthless.blogspot.com

for more about libertarians debate victories over media socialists visit 
http://rexcurry.net/media.html
And
http://rexcurry.net

Fight laws that ban "price gouging" - Laws against "price gouging" cause shortages, poverty, misery and even starvation and mass-slaughter. http://rexcurry.net/gouging-laws.html

PRICE GOUGING IS GOOD ! Repeal laws against Price Gouging. Price Gouging is good, and Capitalism saves lives. The libertarian Attorney Rex Curry shows how. http://rexcurry.net/gouging.html

Price Gouging is benefits humanity.
http://rexcurry.net/gouging-is-good.html

PRICE GOUGING IS GOOD & ANTI GOUGING LAWS ARE BAD How to fight laws against price gouging by libertarian Attorney Rex Curry. Dr. Curry covers freedom, libertarianism http://rexcurry.net/gouginglaws.html

PRO PRICE GOUGING LEGAL DEFENSE FUND & EDUCATION FUND
Welcome to the Pro Price Gouging Legal Defense Fund. Explore our website and see what you can do to provide a better life for everyone. http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging-legal-defense-fund.html

Price Gouging in the Auburn Plainsman - Despite complaints about paying extra for gas after Katrina, many people — not just gas station owners — believe the illegal action of price gouging is good. http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging-auburn.html

price-gouging - The executive order activates a state law that makes price-gouging illegal. It defines the practice as "unconscionable" price increases for lodging etc http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging.html


DANIEL RUTH is LYNDON LAROUCHE?
Daniel Ruth Lyndon LaRouche twins
Daniel Ruth and Lyndon LaRouche. Daniel aka "LaRouche La Ruth." Has anyone ever seen these two together? The mystery of Ruth's hybrid toupee / combover question is solved? Daniel Ruth is notorious for nazi-style name-calling. See http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-lyndon-larouche.jpg


Daniel Ruth, Tampa Tribune, learned about the Pledge at RexCurry.net as did Elaine Silvestrini

Daniel Ruth and the Tampa Tribune promote fetishism. They promote fetishism by covering up the history of the Pledge of Allegiance.  http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.html

Recently, Ruth was schooled by RexCurry.net about the Pledge.
http://rexcurry.net/pledging-allegiance-photographs.html

In an article about the web site Ruth did not dispute the work of the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry (author of "Pledge of Allegiance Secrets"). http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg

In the past Ruth was exposed by Dr. Rex Curry when Curry handed Ruth a humiliating defeat in a public debate dare. Ruth publicly apologized to Dr. Curry for Ruth's errors.  The response against Ruth from the general public was so great that Ruth said he was labeled a "Dork, anti-free market statist $#@%!&@, Dummkopf, liberal, daffy, dolt, stupid, dunce and, oh by the way, socialist." http://rexcurry.net/ruth.html

Ruth's use of "socialist" is very telling in that Ruth covers-up for the National Socialist German Workers Party and its deadly dogma. Ruth has probably never written the actual name of the group "National Socialist German Workers Party" ever in the Tribune (check it yourself).

On the Tribune's flag fetishism, Silvestrini and Ruth are disturbingly silent about Francis Bellamy, Edward Bellamy and their racism, bigotry, militarism, robotic chanting for children, and authoritarian socialism (and their influence upon German National Socialism, its symbols and rituals). Their silence becomes deafening about the related hate-mongering, persecution, violence, and even lynchings inspired by the Bellamys and their socialist religion.  It becomes scarier in that Ruth refers to himself as the "Book of Ruth."

Good Grief, Lyndon LaRouche was not as delusional as Ruth is. Ruth writes flippantly about torture. LaRouche La Ruth's insane clown posse act is like something out of "Apocalypse Now" meets "A Clockwork Orange."

For many years, the near-sighted loony leprechaun (Ruth) has flittered about the fringes of political life in the Tampa Bay area as a sort of scary class clown, in the "special" section, hoping that his kindergarten cracks will make his teachers give up and leave him alone.

Ruth once told a critic that Ruth would let the critic find out if Ruth has a hybrid toupee/combover if the critic paid Ruth $5000 (Ruth knew that if Ruth put the price high enough the critic would pass on Ruth's toupee/combover question). Ruth, a Dominick Dunne wannabe, is the Rump-hole of the Insanely. One suspects that Ruth's flatulence worsens whenever Ruth rubs his brain cells together. Both of them.

Ruth remains jealously mad about Dr. Curry's success in exposing Ruth and that explain's Ruth's pirouettes of linguistic blather. http://rexcurry.net/ruthmore.html

Previously, LaRouche La Ruth proved his supreme economic ignorance. Recently, he has proven his historical ignorance and his legal ignorance.

It is no wonder that Ruth's columns never state any qualifications he has to write articles about the topic (or any articles). Only Ruth's phone number and email address were given with no biographical or background information (nor any link to such information).  There is a complete lack of disclosure of whether Ruth has any licensing or educational achievement that qualifies him to write on such a topic, how he was selected, nor how much Ruth was paid to write the piece (It might embarrass him if they printed what he was paid). Ruth learned to write in  government schools on Planet Zircon 9. Compared to Dr. Curry's illustrious career, Ruth's name is longer than Ruth's career highlights.

As a career move, Daniel Ruth should not become a lawyer.  His "journalism" might cause some people to wonder if he is competent even to write about legal issues, or to write at all about anything. If Ruth is considering a job change then here is a Memo to Daniel Ruth: Don't start packing your bags. Ruth is in a turd trap as the Tampa Tribune twists down the toilet. See any internet search for "Tampa Tribune lays off."

Ruth's employer, the Tampa Tribune, is a so-called newspaper that has never published a historical photograph of the Pledge's early stiff-arm salute, nor printed an article about the Pledge's relationship to the salute of the National Socialist German Workers Party, its symbol and its rituals. Ruth has also never informed his readers about the new discoveries concerning the Pledge's past. http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg

If there has ever been an article about Francis Bellamy (author of the Pledge of Allegiance) in Ruth's newspaper it repeated the usual shallow propaganda common to most "news" outlets. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html

In that way, the Tampa Tribune perpetuates flag fetishism by repeating disinformation through touch-holes such as Ruth. They keep their readers ignorant.

Ruth's writing is similar to robotic chanting in worship of the state. His writing is robotic repetition of claptrap that is taught by the government and learned in government schools (socialist schools). http://rexcurry.net/saying-the-pledge-of-allegiance-pictures.html

That is why the self-important and smug Ruth does not make important discoveries; Ruth writes (badly) about the people who do make important discoveries.

Ruth will not state the simple issue: The Pledge of Allegiance (and its author) was the origin of the salute of the National Socialist German Workers Party and influenced its symbols and rituals. Ruth is a denier and a historical revisionist. Is Ruth dense or does lack of integrity and honesty make him unwilling to provide simple accurate reporting?

Ruth failed to discuss nor even enumerate the six or more issues in Dr. Curry's legal brief argued on behalf of the defendant in a recent federal appellate hearing. Ruth has the ability to let his audience decide for themselves because Ruth could post Dr. Curry's brief on the web site of the Tampa Tribune or TBO.com, but Ruth did not do so and will not do so because the brief would expose his inane comments, omissions and cover-ups. Readers are misled and kept ignorant.

If you read newspapers for years then you will see all manner of ditzoid craziness that slops its way over the journalistic gunwales -claims of UFO abductions, the conspiracy theorists, Nazi cabals, deranged threatening environmentalists and people who believe monkeys are taking over the world.

And those are just some of the serious news stories. There are some newspaper writers, too, who are really weird. Take Daniel Ruth. Please, take him.

For all the black helicopter sightings and arguments Shecky Green and the Jewish lobby control the government and Y2K means the end of the world, Daniel Ruth has to be not only the most certifiably insane, but perhaps the most twistedly evasive.

The Felliniesque Fidel Castro never answered any of the original questions. For example, why is the federal government growing so large, taking over criminal law nationwide, and becoming involved in what in the past would have been state level cases? Daniel Ruth - a "newspaper" writer  - weighed in with one long sputtering bluster against historical reality. Loopy Ruth did his usual mental blank-out. The Karl Marx of the Twilight Zone responded with a bunch of journalistic babble and name-calling that is his "trademark."

Ruth is one of the most visible local disciples of the Tampa Tribune, which ought to have his embarrassed fellow travelers donning Groucho Marx disguises around the office and about town.

You have to wonder what schools Ruth went to.  Government schools?  The government taught him everything it knows and he is still stupid.  But that is statist quo.

Ruth a writer with a big public forum and his reasoning is that of half-baked socialism/statism.  Terrifying.

Ruth's remarks are a reminder of the cliche' "If you can't do, and you can't teach, then write."

Ruth knows that the media debate challenge that was issued by Dr. Rex Curry as quoted by another Tribune reporter ( Elaine Silvestrini ), is also available to Ruth and Ruth knows that everyone else knows that Ruth has always been too cowardly to do it over the many years and he never will. The only person Ruth is fooling is himself.

It will always remain another media debate challenge victory for Dr. Curry over Daniel Ruth and the Tampa Tribune.

Ruth's comments raise the question of whether Ruth is unable to recognize any meritorious arguments in the six or more issues raised on behalf of the defendant in the brief. One of those issues was "insufficiency of the evidence" which is probably the most common issue argued in appeals of criminal cases.

Ruth's comments are especially odd considering that similar appellate issues were raised and argued in six issues raised by another attorney in a related case involving Scott Schweickert, charged as a co-conspirator.  

Was Ruth saying that he would provide ineffective assistance of counsel to a defendant by waiving / abandoning all the issues? Was Ruth saying that Ruth would file an Anders brief for both defendants (in an Anders brief a defense attorney openly states that he believes there are no meritorious issues to argue for a defendant)?

Ineffective assistance of counsel is shown primarily by waiving and abandoning issues. Not by having an extra issue that is not victorious. Most appeals are unsuccessful, meaning that all arguments made in most cases are rejected by the appellate court.

Here is other information that was known to Daniel Ruth and that he omitted from his article: The issues raised in Dr. Curry's brief are not uncommon and similar to most of the issues raised in other briefs, such as that of the Defendant Scott Schweikert (for example, insufficiency of the evidence). Some of the issues were also raised in articles in Ruth's newspaper (the Tampa Tribune) about the case and are also supported by comments made by some judges, jurors and other observers concerning the charges, the trial and the sentence (and some of that is in the brief). The issues are also supported by other people such as the former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi (author of the book "The Prosecution of President George W. Bush for Murder"). It is also consistent with what has been the law historically in the U.S.A.

Some of the issues have also met with some success in United States v. Stewart 348 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 2003) an opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski (who
will be speaking in Tampa to the Federal Bar Association during the same month as this communication to Silvestrini). The Stewart case is available at various locations on the web including http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/348/348.F3d.1132.02-10318.html

Similar arguments were made unsuccessfully in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) (the medical marijuana case cited in the government's brief and in Dr. Curry's brief). United States v. Stewart is a case involving a challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922o under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that mere possession of homemade machine guns can not be constitutionally regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause. Upon granting certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the Ninth Circuit's ruling and remanded the case back to the court for further consideration in light of its ruling in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) where a new decision was issued in Stewart. see http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/315E1DE83BC0D4258
825719D005C71F8/$file/0210318.pdf?openelement


Ruth's inability to undertand the jurisdictional argument on appeal (that the federal government lacked jurisdiction in the case) is bizarre in light of the May 1, 2007 article in the Tampa Tribune reporting that Judge Merryday "...said the federal government is 'not situated to prosecute the real offense, which prosecution is situated in the state of Florida.' "

The Tampa Tribune also wrote, regarding Curry's client: "In sentencing [the defendant] last year, U.S. District Judge Richard Lazzara said that if he were a circuit judge [state level] and the prosecution had brought capital murder charges, the government would have no trouble establishing the presence of four aggravating factors - facets of the case legally required for a death sentence."

Ruth is guilty of ineffective assistance of reporting.

It is no wonder why old-style "newspapers" such as Ruth's are dying out as people turn to the internet for more accurate information.

Every landmark decision by a federal appellate court or the Supreme Court (e.g. Miranda, or the recent case finding the sentencing guidelines unconstititional) is a "landmark" case because it was unanticipated by most people, including such as Ruth and his ilk. 

Ruth is ignorant about the topic of articles that he writes. Although he refused to include it in column, Ruth was aware of Dr. Curry's famous drug-dog case resulting in the suppression of evidence. The government unsuccessfully tried to appeal all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the government's petition on Oct. 31, 2005 in case # 04-1668. Search for "Matheson" on this web page http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/orders/2005/103105pzor.html
The government also unsuccessfully appealed to Florida's Supreme Court to overturn the victory. Also see the Second District Court of Appeal opinoin at
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data2/floridastatecases/app/app2_8_2003/2D00-1611.pdf

Ruth deliberately leaves pertinent information out of his columns to make his columns misleading. Although he refused to include it in his article, Ruth was aware of another case in which a prosecutor wanted Dr. Curry to abandon an issue and withdraw a  motion to suppress evidence. Instead, Curry's motion was granted and the government dismissed the charges against Curry's client as well as two other defendants.
http://rexcurry.net/law-drugs-suppress.pdf

Here is another victory by Dr. Curry in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. http://rexcurry.net/lawcunningham.html
And another victory by Dr. Curry in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. http://rexcurry.net/romanoappeal.html
And another victory in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals http://rexcurry.net/law-martinez-11th-victory.pdf

And other courts:
A win in Federal court http://rexcurry.net/lawmaldon.html
LAWYERS, GUNS (& MONEY) - gun returned after illegal carry charge is defeated. http://rexcurry.net/gunbeeson.html
DRUGS, GUNS & BAD POLICE SEARCHES - another victory for liberty & peacful conduct. http://rexcurry.net/lawWhite.html
ORJALES v. FLORIDA - a 3 year minimum mandatory gun sentence is overturned. http://rexcurry.net/laworjales.html
BALDWIN v. FLORIDA - another 3 year minimum mandatory gun sentence is stricken. http://rexcurry.net/lawbaldwin.html
PEACEFUL COCAINE SALE WITH BAD PURSE SEARCH - lady is free to go. http://rexcurry.net/law%20graphics/tara.html
COPS: THEIR OWN ANONYMOUS TIP SOURCES? - not in this cocaine case. http://rexcurry.net/lawJohnson.html
SELF-REPRESENTATION IN COURT - a lawyer preserves the right to be lawyerless. http://rexcurry.net/lawNeeld.htm

People of Ruth's ilk were completely discouraging about Curry's drug-dog case at the trial level and then wondered why Curry bothered to initiate the appeal.  Later, the same people all expressed amazement at Curry's victory and cited his case.

All "landmark" cases are cases that seemed pointless until the unexpected happened.

How would the Supreme Court ever reverse itself (and it has done so) if no one ever bothered to try and keep raising issues upon which the Supreme Court has already ruled?

Daniel Ruth displayed his igorance about President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's court-packing scam. That scam was as unexpected as was the Supreme Court's "switch in time that saved nine" (also known as the "switch in time that socialized nine") that drastically changed the course of the federal courts.

Ruth doesn't try. Ruth is ineffective and unable to do anything but give up and bend over for the government/prosecution.  Ruth would provide ineffective assistance by deliberately NOT raising issues on appeal because he doesn't want to "distract" from other arguments.  That is a complete waiver / abandonment of the issues. 

There are many REAL examples of ineffective assistance from people who DID abandon issues, using Ruth's reasoning.

The opposite can also occur with a good lawyer: Give the judges a unique issue so that they think that the brief is interesting and they want to have oral arguments, unlike the thousand boring briefs that all sound the same that are filed by the people of Ruth's ilk, and that aren't set for oral arguments.

Dr. Curry's appellate brief was set for oral argument by the appellate court.



Benito Mussolini & Elaine Silvestrini http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini
Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussollini
Benito Mussolini & Elaine Silvestrini http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini
Elaine Silvestrini & Benito Mussolini. The Italian cohort of German National Socialism (Benito Mussolini) developed power as a socialist "journalist" among socialists and socialist newspapers in Italy. He covered up the origin of National Socialist dogma and of its stiff-armed salute. Many modern media mussolinis become mean or tyrannical when an interviewee wants to make a record of an interview. Learn more at RexCurry.net

Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Pledge of Allegiance & Daniel Ruth
Daniel Ruth Tampa Tribune was educated by RexCurry.net about the Pledge of Allegiance ditto for Elaine Silvestrini
Daniel Ruth re: Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune-pledge.jpg Pledge of Allegiance
Daniel Ruth: RexCurry.net's work exposing the Pledge of Allegiance educated the Tampa Tribune Newspaper columnist Daniel Ruth.
THE SICK SOCIALIST SWASTIKA http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg SWASTIKAS & DANIEL RUTH
Daniel Ruth Tampa Tribune was educated by RexCurry.net about the sick socialist swastika, ditto for Elaine Silvestrini
DNAIEL RUTH & THE SICK SOCIALIST SWASTIKA http://rexcurry.net/daniel-ruth-tampa-tribune.jpg SWASTIKAS
Daniel Ruth: RexCurry.net's work exposing the Pledge of Allegiance educated the Tampa Tribune Newspaper columnist Daniel Ruth.

Pledge of Allegiance youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BssWWZ3XEe4 youtube Pledge of Allegiance

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-rexcurrydotnet.wmv FRANCIS BELLAMY

Daniel Ruth http://rexcurry.net/ruthgouge.jpg Tampa Tribune Daniel Ruth
DANIEL RUTH DEFEATED BY DR. REX CURRY ON PRICE GOUGING!
DANIEL RUTH, TAMPA TRIBUNE, DEFEATED BY DR. REX CURRY ON PRICE GOUGING

Fight laws that ban "price gouging" - Laws against "price gouging" cause shortages, poverty, misery and even starvation and mass-slaughter. http://rexcurry.net/gouging-laws.html

PRICE GOUGING IS GOOD ! Repeal laws against Price Gouging. Price Gouging is good, and Capitalism saves lives. The libertarian Attorney Rex Curry shows how. http://rexcurry.net/gouging.html

Price Gouging is benefits humanity.
http://rexcurry.net/gouging-is-good.html

PRICE GOUGING IS GOOD & ANTI GOUGING LAWS ARE BAD How to fight laws against price gouging by libertarian Attorney Rex Curry. Dr. Curry covers freedom, libertarianism http://rexcurry.net/gouginglaws.html

PRO PRICE GOUGING LEGAL DEFENSE FUND & EDUCATION FUND
Welcome to the Pro Price Gouging Legal Defense Fund. Explore our website and see what you can do to provide a better life for everyone. http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging-legal-defense-fund.html

Daniel Ruth & Tampa Tribune defeated by Dr. Rex Curry, free-market advocate, in public debate challenge about "Price Gouging"  http://rexcurry.net/Ruth.html

Price Gouging in the Auburn Plainsman - Despite complaints about paying extra for gas after Katrina, many people — not just gas station owners — believe the illegal action of price gouging is good. http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging-auburn.html

price-gouging - The executive order activates a state law that makes price-gouging illegal. It defines the practice as "unconscionable" price increases for lodging etc http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging.html

Price Gouging Saves lives http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=1593

The only thing worse than Katrina's devastating destruction is government's horrific "help." http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers16.html

So-called "price gouging" in emergencies is also defended by Walter Williams HERE: http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3578

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/walterwilliams/ww20040324.shtml

Frank Bubb HERE: http://www.objectivistcenter.org/text/fbubb_hurricane-gouging.asp?mc

and by Sheldon Richman HERE: http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=6181

Economics textbook chapters on price controls are excerpted here: http://FreedomKeys.com/pricecontrols.htm

The Palm Beach Post exposes Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist with the help of Rex Curry http://rexcurry.net/price-gouging.html

But before I could clean out Sam's Club, Charlie Crist, the Florida attorney general, put the brakes on my road trip. by Dimitri Vassilaros HERE:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/columnists/vassilaros/s_249644.html

sitemeter

sitemeter