The USA originated flag fetishism, robotic group-chanting
to flags, Nazism, Nazi salutes, and the modern swastika
as alphabetical symbolism, as shown in the jaw-dropping discoveries
of the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry (author of "Pledge Of Allegiance
The USA's Pledge
of Allegiance was written by a National Socialist (Francis Bellamy) in 1892
and it spread to many countries, including South Korea.
Today, South Korea even mimicks the American socialist Pledge in South
Korea's use of the hand-over-the-heart gesture, that was substituted for
the previous Nazi gesture.
Socialists in the USA have a long history of influencing flag worship
in other people. Japanese Americans were taught America's stiff-arm salute
in government schools, and even at internment camps or concentration camps.
To this day, China still uses America's early stiff-arm salute.
American socialists even influenced flag worship in the Union of Soviet
Similar side effects can be seen in Singapore. http://rexcurry.net/peoples-action-party-pap-singapore-socialism.html
This question arises: Did Korea and Singapore both begin with the American
socialist salute (the stiff-arm salute) and then switch (following the lead
of government in the U.S.) to the hand-over-the-heart? Preliminary research
indicates that Korea and Singapore both used the stiff-armed American socialist
salute at some time in the past. http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-korea.html
The American socialist salulte probably influenced Korea and Singapore
in the same manner that it influenced the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
and the Peoples' Republic of China. http://rexcurry.net/nazi-salute-taipei-times-roc-republic-of-china-government-officials-sworn.jpg
Korea and Singapore were also influenced by the USSR and the PRC (and they
adopted American flag practices). http://rexcurry.net/ussr-socialist-swastika-cccp-sssr.html
With the defeat of Japan in 1945, the United Nations developed plans for
a trusteeship administration, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics administering
the peninsula north of the 38th parallel and the United States administering
the south. The politics of the Cold War resulted in the 1948 establishment
of two separate governments, North Korea and South Korea.
The government of South Korea has added stipulations about the pledge
of allegiance to its enforcement order for the National Flag Law, which
was passed by the National Assembly in January, 2007.
In the Korean legal system, an enforcement order refers
to one of the detailed regulations made by the government that narrows
the scope of what is permitted by bills passed by the National Assembly.
If the enforcement order contradicts congress-passed bills, it has no effect.
The Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs
on May 3 said, "The National Assembly's committee inspecting proposed bills
decided to keep stipulations about the pledge of allegiance from the law
itself and instead include them in the law's enforcement order. Public
notice has been served that the enforcement order is going to take effect,
so we are listening to what the public says before it occurs."
Korea's pledge of allegiance to the flag, or the "Pledge
in Front of the Flag" (gukgi ape maengse), which was first implemented
by the South Chungcheong Province Office of Education, has been criticized
by some that it had totalitarian parts added when the Yusin regime of president
Park Chung-hee was created in 1972.
The ministry plans to make a final draft after collecting
public opinions until May 13 and then put the matter before the Cabinet
next month. The ministry is preparing to make the enforcement order to take
effect on July 27 when the law for the national flag becomes effective.
The National Assembly removed the pledge from the proposed
version of the National Flag Law last year after the idea of including
it sparked controversy. Instead, the Assembly left the problem of whether
or not to include it in the enforcement order and any matter concering
the wording was left to the ministry. The ministry, however, proposed the
enforcement order on April 23 without taking procedures to collect the
public opinions, such as performing public hearings and public polls.
Kim Seong-ho, an aide to Rep. Hong Mi-young of the pro-government
Uri Party who submitted the bill on the national flag without the pledge
in 2004, said, "It would desirable to remove the outdated regulation on
saying the pledge.''
"Even if it is included in the enforcement order" he
said, "the parts containing the remnants of the military culture forcing
loyalty for the dictatorial regime should be changed.''
"Military Socialism" was the term that Francis Bellamy
and Edward Bellamy used to describe their dogma. America Pledge originally
began with a military salute that was then extended out toward the flag.
It was the origin of America's stiff-arm salute, adopted later by the National
Socialist German Workers Party, and other.
Kim Sang-bong, a professor at Chonnam National University,
said, "The pledge of allegiance aimed at taming many people and making
them objects is not appropriate at a time when South Korea is become a
multi-racial society. Now is the time to discuss whether to keep the pledge
around or not."
The Bellamys wanted government to take over all schools in the USA. When
their wish was granted, the government schools imposed segregation by law
and taught racism as official policy. It served as a horrid example
for three decades before and through the creation of the National Socialist
German Workers' Party. It even outlasted the the NSDAP by more than a decade.
In response, Jeong Ho-yun, an idiotic aide to Rep. Lee
Sang-bae of the main opposition Grand National Party (GNP), said, "These
days individuals are stressed day by day and the state is losing meaning.
The pledge should be maintained to instill patriotism into the hearts of
South Korea Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/pledge-of-allegiance-korea.JPG
China still uses the American salute (the early stiff-arm salute) http://rexcurry.net/nazi-salute-taipei-times-roc-republic-of-china-government-officials-sworn.jpg
Peoples Action Party PAP logo Singapore Socialist Swastikas
Singapore's Peoples Action Party http://rexcurry.net/peoples-action-party-yps-pap.jpg
A pledge to a nation,
or a gang oath?
By Jeong Jeong-hun, lawyer © 2006
The Hankyoreh Media Company.
There is a debate going on right now over whether to continue
the Gukgie daehan maengse, the "Pledge to the Flag," Korea's version
of the pledge of allegiance. That the pledge derived from one that Koreans
were forced to recite during Japanese colonial rule and that its current
wording is a product of the Park Chung-hee dictatorship and thereby risks
being totalitarian is in my view of secondary importance.
The essence of the problem here is that state is forcing
people to be "loyal." Is the state something to be loyal to? There is not
going to be a correct answer to that question as long as it is left to personal
judgment. Whether the state can force loyalty, however, is a different matter.
Forcing people to have loyalty towards the state takes the relationship between
the state and the citizenry and its reciprocity of rights and obligations
and turns it into a hierarchical relationship where the people must live up
to all their duties to country. This takes the unique regulatory kind of
relationship like that which exists in the military and unduly applies it
to the whole population. For this reason, it goes against the basic spirit
of the constitution. It also goes against the direction of history, in which
the position of those who make up a country has constantly changed. People
have elevated their status from feudal subjects forced into loyalty to become
modern citizens in a relationship of rights and obligations, and it would
be wrong to attempt to turn back history.
In the three versions of the revision to the pledge put
forth by the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, all you
find is a people who faithfully fulfill their duty to the state. You do not
find a citizenry which asserts its rights. That is because asserting your
rights is something that fundamentally does not fit with a format for declaring
loyalty. In light of how historically state power has often translated into
violence towards sovereign citizens, what is needed instead is a civic spirit
that sees the state as an object of control.
Those in favor of the pledge say they are worried about
"individualism" on the part of young students these days. However, it would
be fatal poison for the health of the community to prescribe collectivism
and or nationalism for dealing with individualism. Collectivism is merely
an expanded form of individualism. The right approach would be to instill,
through history education based on a perspective of peace, the idea that
the individual exists in a social relationship and that the state and the
Korean people as an ethnic group are one of those relationships, thereby bringing
back the spirit of inter-relatedness.
There was a time years ago when teams playing football
(soccer) would fight over whether or not a goal was valid if it was made right
at 5 p.m., when the whole country was supposed to drop everything and stand
still for the pledge broadcast every day. Those times were real tragicomedy
forced upon the nation by a modern history full of twisted principles. Today,
more than 70 percent of the public supports keeping the pledge, a sad example
of the social effects of nationalist education and defining ourselves solely
as a country's nationals.
Changes and development in history have come not through
the internalization of the spirit of loyalty and obedience, but with a spirit
that is free and critical and the courage to question what is assumed to be
self-evident. In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled that punishing
a person for damaging the U.S. flag would damage the precious freedom it is
supposed to symbolize. All that you have when the state forces you to pledge
loyalty and in a social atmosphere that makes you internalize one-way discipline
is freedom's shadow.
Criminal gangs force new members to pledge their loyalty,
too. That is surely because you need to disallow criticism through that kind
of format if you want to maintain an organization that lacks legitimacy.
State philosophy is destitute if it tries to establish the legitimacy of
state power the easy way - by forcing a pledge of loyalty instead of by guaranteeing
freedom and equality for its members as well as achieving justice through
efforts by the state in cooperation with social consensus. The state thirsts
after the position of Absolute as it forces people to make its pledge, but
to me that attempt looks more like a vision for the state that comes out of
a gangster mindset. The pledge takes the citizens for low-level gangsters
and as such should be abolished, because that is what would fit with the spirit
of the constitution, which declares that it is from the people that the state
gains legitimacy for its power and authority.
"Dr. Curry showed that the early Pledge Of Allegiance did not use
an ancient Roman salute, and that the 'ancient Roman salute'
myth came from the Pledge Of Allegiance." http://rexcurry.net/roman-salute-metropolitan-museum-of-art.html
CLICK FOR LARGER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE http://rexcurry.net/pledge-allegiance-pledge-allegiance.jpg
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge Of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/i-pledge-allegiance-to-the-flag.jpg
Pledge Of Allegiance
Many people have marveled at Adolf Hilter's "hypnotic" powers and
his propaganda skills, as if he was the first of his kind as head of the
National Socialist German Workers Party. Adolf Hitler's propaganda had
already been pioneered by Francis Bellamy, Edward Bellamy and American
socialists. They put government flags over schools, in classrooms and
everywhere. Francis Bellamy's original Columbus Day program was a blueprint
of nationwide propaganda for socialism in government schools. They dictated
daily robotic chanting. People who refused were persecuted. As the
government's schools spread, segregation was imposed by law and racism
was taught as official policy.
The Pledge is the government's way of telling you that
it does not trust you and that it thought you were a liar yesterday
when it made you chant about allegiance. It will feel the same
way about you tomorrow when it makes you do it again. And the next
day. And so on, and so on.......
Shocking PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PHOTOGRAPHS page 1 http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
Court litigation about the Pledge of Allegiance is fascinating.
As a pro bono service to help the media and the public understand
the bigger issues, Dr. Rex Curry collects astounding historic
photos and information about the pledge and this is the only place
to find them.
A recent court case led to scary discoveries
about the Pledge’s pedigree. A libertarian made the historic
news-breaking discovery that exposed the Pledge as the origin
of the salute of the monstrous National Socialist German Workers’
A recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court
was a blessing in disguise, because it provided a temporary
delay and avoided the primary issue. It allowed
the fight to widen against the entire Pledge, not just two words.
As a libertarian and a lawyer, Dr. Rex
Curry is spearheading future court litigation as a pro bono
service to the public to liberate Americans from government
pushing the totalitarian Pledge. http://www.rexcurry.net/pledge5.html
Some of the litigation started in the
case of U.S. v. Wonschik at http://www.rexcurry.net/pledge4.html
“Pledge II” will be a blockbuster sequel.
A QUICK SCARY
- about the ideas that inspired the pledge
and caused atrocities worldwide.
THE BELLAMY COUSINS - Francis Bellamy
wrote the pledge, Edward Bellamy inspired Francis, both
and the ideas that inspired them and
the pledge caused mass atrocities worldwide.
- 1855-1931. He wrote the pledge and he
died just as his salute & ideas became even more infamous.
- 1850-1898. He wrote "Looking Backward" but he
didn't have to look back at his socialist slaughter.
- for the first time ever on the internet: the
speech that accompanied the first Pledge of Allegiance.
It is exposed and explained with references
to "Looking Backward" and the "Industrial Army." Only
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
- and the worship of
government. A different look at the ideas in the Newdow
- even more secret photos of the original military
- Did government schools in the U.S. inspire the National
Socialist German Worker's Party?
DEFY THE SOCIALIST PLEDGE
- these resources help them
to stop the Pledge in government schools (and out).
OR STUDENTS SALUTE THE FLAG ?
or say the pledge in government
- government schools teach intolerance
- as official government policy from socialism
and its government schools.
-in government schools abetted by Francis Bellamy.
- and socialism and government schools are inherently
racist and bigoted.
- do they disagree with the kids in
the Gobitas Case? What about the Supreme Court's Newdow
WHO LIKE THE PLEDGE
- are they the Society of Christian
Socialists? Which case do they like and why? What do they believe
about the Pledge of Allegiance to the Christian Flag?
scary details about the old pledge & survival tips if
you keep reciting.
- says "Thanks!" for showing that crazy socialists
in the U.S. created the salute and ideas
before German socialists did it in
the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
- the History Channel documentary leaves a lot
- U.S. socialists promoted racism, eugenics and hatred
of individuality & differences.
- won't show you photos of the U.S. flag's original socialist
salute. And government schools won't either.
- RexCurry.net pioneers philosophical concepts
untouched by media & the public.
- this site pays for historic photos showing the
original U.S. flag salute.
POSTCARDS TO SHARE
of the U.S. flag's original socialist salute.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
- for government to pledge to you.
A SOCIALIST WROTE THE PLEDGE
- for allegiance to socialism in government schools.
FLAG DAY LETTER
- June 14 letter to the editor for you to use to educate the
public & media.
It is a myth that the Pledge’s original
straight-arm salute is an ancient Roman salute. http://www.rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
To a totalitarian socialist, "liberty
and justice for all" means the opposite of what it means
for everyone else.
When a totalitarian socialist says
"liberty and justice for all" he is telling you that he wants
to rob and enslave you.
The only reason that people don't despise
the hand-over-the-heart salute is because it wasn't used
by the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Nazi salute http://ftp.ij.net/rex/nazi%20salute%204.jpg
Nazi salute http://ftp.ij.net/rex/nazi%20salute%209.jpg
In addition to the notorious salute,
American socialists (e.g. Edward Bellamy and Francis Bellamy teamed with
the Theosophical Society and Freemasons) also bear some blame for the
notorious symbol usd by the National Socialist German Workers Party. The
same symbol was used by the Theosophical Society during the time when the
Bellamys, Freemasons and the Theosophical Society worked together. They
also helped spread the stiff arm salute via the Pledge at their meetings.